|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
whats the benefit of the 1st order slope for multiway speakers? I hear a lot of criticisms about them like lobing and high distortion so why do a small minority of designers still use it? Some very well respected and reviewed speakers use them.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Queensland
|
There are few areas that have so many "RIGHT" answers as cross-over theory. Interestingly you get 1st order networks used in the cheapest and some of the most expensive designs. So that gives you one reason: low parts count and therefore economical. Now where they are championed for theorectical reasons is for they're minimal phase change at the cross over point.
This is a large area and you may get a lot of responses but it may be best to "google" a search on speaker crossovers and look at a dedicated site. There are just a lot of issues to consider. I.e. cost, phase, power handling, lobbing, termination (of high level passive networks), overall efficency of the complete system, intermodulation distortion in the amps of active designs etc. Have fun! To my mind it is a facinationg area to study. Cheers, Jonathan Hi PS. Just looked up you profile/stats in the members area......You area man of great faith! You got 149 posts last time you raised the issue......I doubts me the science has advanced all THAT much since you last enquired. Do you have a specific issue you want to address? The Linkwitz site might be a good place to start on theory but while he is a committed 4th order man he is good on the hard science and I learnt a lot from him 30 odd yrs ago. And there are people who want more than 4th order btw........
__________________
"It was the Spring time of the year when aunt calls to aunt like mastodons across the frozen waste." P.G. Wodehouse. Last edited by Jonathan Bright; 4th August 2011 at 07:29 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
|
1. order slopes is a two edged sword; on one hand you get more through it, on the other you also get more through it
Its like policy, when one issue is addressed a magnitude if other unintended and often unexpected effects are brought to life Best thing is to play with different filter approaches to get a tacit feel of the matter as theory on this topic doesn´t quite cut it alone or pay it justice either... best, |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
The advantage is rather straightforward to comprehend: with 1st order (6 dB/octave) filters, the outputs of the filtered drivers sum correctly when the listener's ear is equidistant to the acoustic centers of the drivers. This does not happen with higher-order filters.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Some reading here
I believe that article covers the subject of passive crossovers in general pretty well. Oh, and this may be of some use.
__________________
"Throwing parts at a failure is like throwing sponges at a rainstorm." - Enzo My setup: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi...tang-band.html
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
i prefer not to read the esp site, it seems biased and so does the linkwitz site.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
Well, professor, Linkwitz's site is invaluable. I'm afraid I cannot help you much more than this.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
you can build a speaker with 1.order
and it may even sound 'ok' or maybe even quite good just don't play louder than average SPL at louder SPL it will distort, and begin to sound unpleasant might also be a problem with power response no control but if you always listen at very low SPL, then you might actually get better sound with the simplest 1.order |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
|
1st order crossovers are ideal in theory, until you try to use them in the real world. It's nearly impossible to achieve an actual 1st order slope when you have the natural 2nd order high pass at the low end of the driver response and the cone breakup modes at the upper end. To achieve a true 1st order slope the drivers must be able to reproduce at least 3 octives beyond the intended passband, which means the design would probably need to be at least a 4 or 5 way design. Also the drivers must be time aligned throughout thier respective passbands, which won't be easy due to frequency dependent phase shift in each driver. There are other issues also, as alluded to in prior posts. Sorry to be the voice of reason here, but real 1st order crossovers are extremely difficult to do correctly for pros, nearly impossibe for amateurs.
Mike |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Electrical vs. Acoustic Slopes | sdclc126 | Multi-Way | 12 | 16th January 2011 08:42 PM |
| WWYD? Higher order acoustic slopes and lower order targets | cuibono | Multi-Way | 3 | 3rd December 2009 11:36 PM |
| Crossover Slopes In Context. | BlueWizard | Multi-Way | 71 | 22nd February 2008 07:30 AM |
| Q about filter slopes | JMB | Multi-Way | 16 | 8th April 2006 10:47 AM |
| Question about crossover slopes | e-side | Multi-Way | 4 | 10th February 2006 07:41 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11515 seconds (78.34% PHP - 21.66% MySQL) with 11 queries |