Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 3rd August 2011, 08:36 AM   #1
AllenB is offline AllenB  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Default Orientation of assymetrical tractrix mid/bass horn

These larger floorstanding horns are often built with one pair of sides following the tractrix contour, and the other pair of sides offering a conical contour, more waveguide style.

I 'm interested in opinions as to which horizontal/vertical orientation you prefer.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2011, 02:04 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New York State USA
Imo, somewhat irrelevant which way it goes... a bit depends on how high you let it go.
But the flat side (conical) section would do better to match the floor, in all probability, since it looks more like an extension of that side, making the horn have a bit of better response in the LF (but not much). This assumes a direct contact with the floor.

Again, depends on what you mean by "mid" and how low of a "bass" horn it is.
It seems to me that if you are really going into the bass, then you do not want a tractrix, you want something that will extend lowest - more like a hypex? Or perhaps a longer folded horn, or a rear loaded driver (assuming ur interested in LF extension in the main).

Just my thoughts... others may differ, ymmv.

_-_-bear
__________________
_-_-bear
http://www.bearlabs.com ...ur feeback please - like/dislike my what I have written? PM/email tnx. --
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2011, 02:24 PM   #3
AllenB is offline AllenB  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Hi Bear,

My thoughts have been pretty much that. The conical sides would hold a more consistent pattern and I pefer that in the horizontal....on the other hand, I'd like the flatter panel on the ground for the better half-space approximation as well as floor bounce issues.

The tractrix is a bit of a gamble. I'd rather a shorter horn but there's no free lunch, although tractrix has been done successfully before and isn't such a bad contour. I don't think it makes as much difference down here anyway.

But I do want horn loading in this band and not just pattern control. I'm flaring at 95 to 115. I'll probably do 115 and hijack a room mode to extend it a little. The shorter horn might be preferrable. I want to go beyond 600Hz.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2011, 10:17 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New York State USA
i said conical to the ground, if I wasn't clear...

There is no "pattern" to think about at those freqs in general...

Flare at 100 Hz will work to 200Hz in a usual Tractrix, with some room or floor coupling, it may extend lower, dunno... others may have practical experience in this specific sort of thing.

Horn loading, you mean 'gain', will depend on getting some compression, as the "pattern control" aspect will add some lift at the freqs where the horn comes into play, but if you have a driver with a "rising response" that will yield a flat freq response, then there is no effective gain over the freq where the horn has stopped doing much...

It should be ok, but the tradoff is really around the xover point that is chosen, and how that is handled. Personally I prefer to keep the widest range beyond the 300-3000Hz. band in one single driver (horn in this case) - say 200 to 4-5kHz. or better... which is likely impossible without a compression driver of some sort due to the throat dimensions mostly...

_-_-bear
__________________
_-_-bear
http://www.bearlabs.com ...ur feeback please - like/dislike my what I have written? PM/email tnx. --
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th August 2011, 09:10 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Brett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
My experience with three or four trax flares is that they tend to load to about 1.4x (root2) the design Fc. A hypex will load better lower than a trax for a midbass, especially if size is a consideration.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th August 2011, 10:45 AM   #6
AllenB is offline AllenB  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Would you say this if they both had the same throat, mouth and length?
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th August 2011, 02:32 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New York State USA
yes...
__________________
_-_-bear
http://www.bearlabs.com ...ur feeback please - like/dislike my what I have written? PM/email tnx. --
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Plans for a mid-bass tractrix horn? jdubs Multi-Way 12 3rd August 2011 09:16 PM
JBL 2226J Mid bass horn - need help doug20 Multi-Way 60 1st June 2011 06:32 AM
Mid-bass horn (easy to build) carpenter Multi-Way 66 26th April 2011 07:27 PM
Manifold mid bass horn entry??? fredos Subwoofers 0 28th October 2008 09:32 PM
First pictures of my mid-bass horn, painted angeloitacare Multi-Way 16 20th June 2008 02:27 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:00 AM.

Page generated in 0.08629 seconds (81.03% PHP - 18.97% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio