|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Kirkland, WA
|
I'm wondering if it's possible to amplify before either a DEQ2496 or DCX2496 and then apply the necessary crossover instead of building an analog crossover that is housed inside the speaker cabinet. I don't want to have to have a separate amp for the tweeter and mid, just one. Is this possible?
Source ---> Amp ---> DCX/DEQ2496 ===> Tweeter, Mid (separate connections for each) Basically, I'm trying to avoid having to pay for crossover components (~ $150) when I'm already going to be buying one of these devices anyway. Last edited by Frosteh; 15th July 2011 at 02:06 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
You don't amplify before the DCX/DEQ, but after it. So what you're asking is unclear.
Still - you can run a 2-way active with a passive high pass for the tweeter. I do.
__________________
Take the Speaker Voltage Test! |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hangzhou - Marco Polo's 'most beautiful city'. 700yrs is a long time though...
Blog Entries: 46
|
I think he's asking can he use DEQ/DCX as a programmable passive XO. The answer's a very clear no. If you want active adding another amp is not optional, its essential.
__________________
I think ideas are what you want to get rid of. I don't really like songs with ideas. - Leonard Cohen |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Yes, I think that might have been the question. It was just too bizarre for me to contemplate!
DrDyna - I use a lower power tube amp, so no DC thump. Pro tweeters, too, so pretty rugged.
__________________
Take the Speaker Voltage Test! |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Kirkland, WA
|
Quote:
One advantage to having a separate amp for tweeter and mid would be that I could control tweeter and mid volume independently. The downside is, I'd have to control tweeter and mid volume independently. Anyone have any experience with this instead of a simple passive XO in the speaker and a single amp? Last edited by Frosteh; 15th July 2011 at 02:36 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Kirkland, WA
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Kirkland, WA
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: DCX2496 and DEQ2496 in Australia | PeteW | Swap Meet | 10 | 12th October 2006 03:30 AM |
| deq2496 and/or dcx2496 | aaronboumans | Digital Line Level | 9 | 23rd March 2006 07:38 PM |
| Best soundcard for optical out to my DEQ2496 -> DCX2496? | mazeroth | Digital Line Level | 5 | 16th February 2006 09:06 PM |
| aTTn: DEQ2496 + DCX2496 owners | sqlkev | Digital Line Level | 2 | 10th February 2006 08:19 PM |
| DEQ2496, then input info into a DCX2496? | mazeroth | Digital Line Level | 1 | 21st September 2005 05:25 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09706 seconds (79.01% PHP - 20.99% MySQL) with 11 queries |