|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: big city
|
Does anyone have any experience with a WTMW alignment ??
X over points will be 150 /800/ 3800 hz The bottom end bass is on the side of the cabinets WTMW on the front . thank you to anyone who can shine any light on this topic |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
Having two front woofers in that range will give you some control with floor/ceiling interactions.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: big city
|
No Downsides though ?
I was told that using two mids will be a bad thing to do Are woofers different ? Much less directional for sure compared to tweeters and mids . There are some companies that even use two tweeters like the top of the line Von Schweikert Two mids , two tweeters and a super tweeter in the center. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
What disadvantage with dual mids were you told about? Certainly they are harder to do without measurement. There is a benefit to be had with lobing around the crossover point, if that's something you want. About the woofers, they'd have to be large to be directional at 800Hz, notwithstanding the interaction between the two. If it were me, I'd do some drawing and modelling the distances to the floor/ceiling for each woofer and compare phase etc.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: big city
|
I was told that MTM will not image as good as MT ?
Less Focus if MTM is used ? Therefore I am going to use One midrange only |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Norlane; Geelong: Victoria: Australia
|
Doesn't having 3 XO points mean you are designing a 3.5 way ??
Problems only if the M is too big, MTM works extremely well for me when 140mm or smaller is used. My MTM using 205mm has a very small sweet spot.
__________________
QUOTE" The more I know, the more I know, I know (insert maniacal laugh >here<) NOTHING" |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: big city
|
No I m doing a 4 way 15 , 2x10 , Mid , tweeter
Yes the small diam makes sense for sure . The mids I am using are large magnets total around 180 mm ? I think the single point source from the mid may work better though. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
depending on the mid, I would think twice about xo points
with 10" woofers, I would let them roll off by themselves, acousticly and adjust the 15" rolloff accordingly might be anywhere betweeen 50hz to 100hz, active 800hz seems a bit high for a 10" but as said, depends on your mid did miss which midrange driver ? |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: big city
|
they are Volt 2500 nice midbass units
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Shorter MTM array or larger TM array? | goldyrathore | Multi-Way | 4 | 30th November 2011 08:04 PM |
| Vertical WTMW driver alignment - pros and cons | jb0194 | Multi-Way | 1 | 16th November 2008 09:20 PM |
| looking for opinion | xxxwhezzy | Car Audio | 9 | 8th May 2008 03:53 PM |
| Want your opinion! | vdi_nenna | Pass Labs | 9 | 16th January 2004 03:27 PM |
| I need your opinion.. | Richard Moon | Everything Else | 1 | 11th January 2004 06:14 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10201 seconds (78.27% PHP - 21.73% MySQL) with 10 queries |