|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Arkansas
|
I've been kind of tossing around in my head the idea of doing a speaker project "inspired by..." the Harbeth 40.1.
At present I have a pair of Rogers LS7T speakers that I like rather a lot, except that their low frequency output can't really keep up with the dynamics they're able to reproduce in the mids and highs. ![]() Rogers Speakers - Rogers LS7 Rather than do the sensible thing and add a pair of subwoofers, I was thinking of harvesting the drivers from the Rogers, adding a 12" woofer, and putting them all in new boxes. A 12" + 8" + dome is the same format as the Harbeth Monitor 40.1, a speaker I happen to admire very much, although its price, even used, is far beyond my means. ![]() ![]() I'm thinking that one of the 12" woofers from the Seas/Scan/Vifa/Tymphany/Peerless/SB family of drivers ought to fit the plan. (I'm not fishing for you guys to do my homework and pick one for me... I know I won't be able to just plop the Rogers crossovers into a new system and expect it to work. For one thing the wider baffle will require different baffle step compensation. I do have some ability to make measurements, since I run SmaartLive at my "day job". The Monitor 40.1 cabinet dimensions are 750mm H X 432mm W X 400mm D (approx. 29.5" x 17" x 15.75"). I imagine I'd copy the height and width, and let the depth fall wherever the woofer's volume requirements take me. One thing that concerns me is that the Rogers are rated at 88dB/1W/1M sensitivity; the Harbeths are rated at 84dB, so a 12" woofer that would match the Rogers drivers' sensitivity would likely require a larger enclosure. I might be better off looking at 10" units? I could also be convinced to abandon the idea of trying to re-use the Rogers components and just start with all-new stuff. Anyway I just wanted to throw these ideas out there, comments and criticism are welcome. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I'll be following this closely, I've been flirting with the idea of trying a classic 3 way like this. I think it would be fun to try. I've got some old kenwoods that came from japan in the 70's that I use in the garage where I do my building and every time I see them I get the idea of making a more modern version with a proper crossover.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cascais
|
Quote:
There are nice 10" (not many...). But if the Harbeth Monitor 40.1 is a 12" I would go with that idea. I have a diy speaker with a 10", but it plays with a 5" mid. Last edited by Inductor; 11th June 2011 at 01:15 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Arkansas
|
Quote:
I do have a pair of Rogers LS7Ts just like the ones in the picture. And IF I harvest drivers from them, I'll not scrap anything or do any irreversible damage, 'cause if I do the project and it doesn't turn out well, I can always put the Rogers back together. No I don't have the 12"s yet. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
__________________
Photobucket picture pages: http://photobucket.com/Wolf-Speakers_and_more Writeups/thoughts/blogs: http://techtalk.parts-express.com/blog.php?u=4102 |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Front Row Center
|
Interesting how Harbeth recesses their mid unit, very odd .........
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Later, Wolf
__________________
Photobucket picture pages: http://photobucket.com/Wolf-Speakers_and_more Writeups/thoughts/blogs: http://techtalk.parts-express.com/blog.php?u=4102 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Arkansas
|
Quote:
Spendor, who also come from a BBC background, rear-mount some of their woofers and front-mount others. And Rogers used a similar 8" poly to mine in their Studio 1 speaker, rear-mounted, whereas my LS7s are front-mounted. I would think there would be measurable diffraction from that step-back, but who knows? |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Lake Superior
|
Quote:
I always preferred two way designs because they seemed more crisp and coherent to my ears. Be fun to hear those...........nice of them to share all that r & d with the DIY community. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Poor Man's Strad | peace brainerd | Multi-Way | 73 | 26th July 2011 09:56 AM |
| Poor man's strad | zimjj | Multi-Way | 3 | 22nd August 2009 01:12 AM |
| Poor man's signal generator. | Circlotron | Everything Else | 10 | 17th September 2002 12:13 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11606 seconds (80.61% PHP - 19.39% MySQL) with 10 queries |