|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London
|
Is it down to room placement or treble loss? Just seems that in our current ipod dock/ playing music off laptop era, people are more likely to be moving around a room ie bedrooms or workplace; there are many advantages to the omni.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
If you mean among the general public then how about a lack of interest
...but even among us here, constant directivity is a developing concept.I can appreciate someone not wanting sound to go backward. I absorb my rear reflections, and I wrestled with dipoles even though they had so much goodness to offer. But surely if you advocate omnipoles then you appreciate narrow controlled directivity, which shouldn't be hard for even the fussiest to accept as relatively benign and yet offering much. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London
|
what the feck is an omnipole?
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
is said to have poor imaging etc
I would say its a myth maybe based on poor designs due to my recent experiment I conclude its not entirely true with an omni dipole I managed to get quite precise soundstage for one, crossover function is important, ofcourse second, maybe the well defined directivity is of benefit meaning, equal 360degr dispersion for all drivers for a heavy woofer I might consider multiple woofers kind of like a bipole design to avoid cone sagging |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London
|
Thanks Tinitus
I'm looking at the Mirage Omniguide and I'm wondering what their Patent is for- I don't see whats so different about their design compared to some other omni's and their lens designs.. they all radiate sound around the room in a similar way quote "The Omniguide module is a simple, ingenious design that distributes sound directly towards the listener, as well as reflects it off walls, ceilings and other surfaces, making the entire room the sweet spot. In other words, wherever you sit in the room, you’ll hear the same enveloping experiences.” Last edited by Bill poster; 3rd June 2011 at 03:13 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
the only Mirage designs I know of are bipoles
I do not know about their Omniguide module |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
49 - for the 16th time
diyAudio Member
|
I'm a fan of Omni - esp. for HT - but music is enjoyable by not being limited to listening in the "sweet spot".
I have regular monitor type speakers to listen with and compare with soooooo it sorta depends on mood and use. As with all speakers - pluses and minus - and still no perfect speaker system. The only answer (I tell SWMBO) is to have a model of each type!!!!
__________________
"You can't always get what you want" K. Richards/M. Jagger *** "Next time I will know some things better" Zen Mod |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London
|
Oh I see, like Jim Griffin's full range Bipole (which is a great idea).
The first omni I saw where those Canon's from the 80s. Fugly but cool looking. I think the driver they used was the missing link rather than the speaker itself. Back to the Mirage, what does their patent cover? Its just that I drew up something last night with the drive unit at a slight angle firing into a long oval shaped lens. The Mirage is similar in that the speaker is on an angle but I have seen others like this.. so I am struggling to see what their Patent covers, it doesnt mention the angled speaker tho. http://ii.alatest.com/product/600x40...at-Black-0.jpg Last edited by Bill poster; 3rd June 2011 at 04:05 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
I personally think the only way you can make an omni-directional speaker that isn't compromised in some way, is to make the actual drivers cylindrical.
Pointing a driver up or down, or using multiple drivers in a circle, just doesn't seem the best to me. Fortunately, if you happen to have a King's Random laying around in a coffee can somewhere, there are these speakers - mbl 101 X-treme - MBL of America Mbl 101 X-Treme Speakers Cost More Than a Ferrari - Technabob mbl 101E Radialstrahler loudspeaker | Stereophile.com Enlarged Photo Enlarged Photo But beyond special drivers like this, at best, omni-directional speakers tend to be something of a novelty. They can sound OK, but like all aspects of life, they come with compromises. You rarely gain in one area without losing in some other area. Steve/bluewizard |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| DIY Omni Directional Speakers | Magnetar | Multi-Way | 59 | 30th August 2011 12:11 PM |
| Why aren't coaxial speakers more popular? | Tyson | Multi-Way | 25 | 1st September 2010 06:02 AM |
| omni directional speakers | dvsound | Introductions | 4 | 25th November 2007 03:21 PM |
| Any ideas for el-cheapo omni speakers? | Spasticteapot | Multi-Way | 4 | 8th November 2006 01:14 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12115 seconds (81.90% PHP - 18.10% MySQL) with 11 queries |