|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bavarian Forest
|
Hello all!
Currently I am walking on the borderline between OB and enclosure with some success. More as a desperate try without much hope to get more bass extension I put a sewer pipe I had left from an other experiment behind a U-Frame and it worked so well that I made a permanent installation out of it. But what is it? Is is just an OB with enhanced acoustic short circuit? Or is there some loading? The other expample: a corner speaker consisting of three quarter-circles. Surprising bass from a little fullranger with good tonal balance. Physical impact of a horn, but directed bass response like a dipole. Which of the two is it? I didn't do measurements, a bit because I fear that it measures worse than it sounds, a bit because of laziness. Oliver |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sydney
|
Interesting, you could probably model these several ways, maybe one way to view the first one is as a lossy quarter wave pipe, 'cause you'll have some pipe resonance, but the Q will be lowered by the open sides...??? But of course there will be some OB effects as well. Have you tried some damping directly behind the driver, to eliminate reflections though the cone?
The second one looks a bit like a Karlson, without the BR behind the driver, more like a TL with a flared opening, (I've tried this too, using 6" pipe, it works well)
__________________
‘today… there lives alongside the twentieth century the tenth or thirteenth. A hundred million people use electricity and still believe in the magic power of signs and exorcisms” Trotsky |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bavarian Forest
|
I don't think there are TL effects, at least no useful ones. Speaker one is 1 meter and open at both sides, so a half wave resonatior, second speaker is 50x50x50 cm. Resonances should be in the fundamental region, without influences on the bass.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Methinks if you blocked the top (sit some board on top), it'd turn into some rear-loaded horn.
The driver won't be experiencing much loading from the cabinet at low frequencies, of this I'm almost certain.
__________________
"Throwing parts at a failure is like throwing sponges at a rainstorm." - Enzo My setup: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi...tang-band.html
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bavarian Forest
|
I think I'll have to measure again and post the two curves. The U-frame alone gave 80 Hz and would have needed a sub urgently. Now I can live more or less without it, and I don't think this is because a rise >= 80Hz. Can it be a horn-reflex?
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
|
Midway between open and closed box ,or at least the back wave sees a sort of micro-hall (ambient),so what you hear is an already reverberated sound that is already 'ambient processed' on its own .
IMO |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bavarian Forest
|
So an elongated acoustic short circuit?
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
|
sorry : 'elongation' finds no matches in my brain
time : 0.1 s 0 results |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bavarian Forest
|
The foldings don't cause loading, but just make the acoustic short circuit longer.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bavarian Forest
|
Strangely in free-field the bass extension is rather less, but there is no pipe resonance whatsoever and also the 200 Hz peak probably caused by baffle diffraction is gone. The advantage in bass extension is only there close to a corner, but also here it is mainly the improved bass quality that counts. The tube obviously mainly did what I originally intended, and that very well.
Last edited by el`Ol; 25th May 2011 at 08:07 PM. |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Which type of enclosure | adelphia83 | Car Audio | 5 | 12th May 2011 12:13 PM |
| Changing enclosure type? | Johnnz | Multi-Way | 1 | 8th August 2008 10:53 PM |
| What type of enclosure?? | e-side | Multi-Way | 5 | 25th December 2005 06:17 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10497 seconds (79.82% PHP - 20.18% MySQL) with 11 queries |