|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Taiwan
|
I once did similar thing.
I used large felt pad covering whole rear side of OB. The intrinsic character of almost all sound-absorbing materials is low pass. So the rear radiation would be restricted in lower range, thus an asymmetry front to back response along the frequency. Yes the overall in room response would be bass heavy in tonal balance (if all other things being the same). Once the FR is re-adjusted for reasonably flat for the listening position, then the asymmetry of front-rear responses would sound very different from a 'normal' OB -- to my ears, it's inferior. It's not the 'box' sound of ordinary boxed speakers, but the changing polar responses from low to high would be a bad thing in overall presentation. I guess the polar response (off axis behavior) contributes to the beloved OB sounds more than the resonance free (box-less) construction. What I said above is for wide band OB speaker. If in multi-way modular type speakers, such device can be used to tune to fit specific design goal... (cardioid midrange, for example) If so, that'll be another story.... ps. oh, one last thing. So called "box free" is mainly affecting the midrange (or to midbass at max.). While bass to sub-bass is not a major concern, actually. Last edited by CLS; 21st May 2011 at 06:35 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: iowa
|
I liked it. But if you have the room to have the baffles 6' or greater from the front wall, I'd run without it.
But if you have an open backed box, definitely cover the side walls at least. Norman |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tampa, FL
|
I think what you will get is something like what John K did with his cardoid woofers, or like Hartly did with their "boffle". I think you can achive favorable results, you just have to account for what's going on.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
|
Thanks for the replies
Quote:
The speaker will be a two-way with this woofer and this wideband, with the latter in a 350 hz JMLC front horn. Will it be best to keep the back of both the woofer and wideband driver enclosed in foam or just the woofer I wonder? Unfortunately I don't have the space for wide OB's placed far away from the walls. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Taiwan
|
With horn on the mid-high, it's worth trying cardioid in your bass section. Do it first, at least. Since it's already 'asymmetric' front/rear on your horn.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Upwards aligned open baffle? ( pop box meets open baffle ) | OllBoll | Full Range | 3 | 28th March 2011 01:00 AM |
| open baffle enclosure for FRS | Jazzz | Full Range | 9 | 27th June 2007 02:41 PM |
| Foam, thicker foam or Open Cell | qguy | Subwoofers | 4 | 11th March 2007 07:06 PM |
| open baffle subwoofer "enclosure" dimensions | noodle_snacks | Multi-Way | 4 | 18th July 2006 06:51 AM |
| Australians- what solid timbers for baffle? (open baffle loudspeaker) | tktran | Multi-Way | 13 | 29th November 2004 11:09 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09203 seconds (75.68% PHP - 24.32% MySQL) with 10 queries |