|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
  |
|
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
16th May 2011, 10:53 PM
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
serial filter baffle step compensation
I have a first order filter where the woofer inductance is compensated with a RC to keep the impedance at 6 ohm.
I want to experiment with baffle step compensation and add an inductor ( like a second order filter for the woofer section). It seems to me that first compensating for, and then adding an inductor is unnecessary. Can i ditch the RC compensation and add a inductor minus the inductance of the woofer. Any flaws in that thought? |
|
|
17th May 2011, 07:09 AM
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Newcastle, Australia
|
__________________
No longer DIY active |
|
|
|
17th May 2011, 12:42 PM
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
|
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| When to use baffle step compensation? | tmblack | Multi-Way | 28 | 6th December 2008 12:39 PM |
| Baffle Step Compensation Adjustment | wigginjs | Multi-Way | 17 | 31st January 2008 06:44 PM |
| JX92S and baffle step compensation | neil_kaye | Full Range | 12 | 6th December 2006 12:20 PM |
| baffle step in serial filter | Marcelinho | Multi-Way | 0 | 30th June 2006 10:56 PM |
| Baffle Step Compensation | Khron | Multi-Way | 4 | 16th April 2006 08:23 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07668 seconds (70.10% PHP - 29.90% MySQL) with 10 queries |
