|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
|
I have decided to completely rebuild my loudspeakers, and have:
Seas Excel Millenium tweeters; Seas W22 ex001 bass/mid units I am umming and ahhing about going three way. notwithstanding my driver complement, I've had a diet of yamaha Ns1000m speakers that have low distortion and super fast transients. one of the best things is that the bass is very tight and taught with little or no overhang. I've heard quite a few other speakers - planer types, horns, etc. the most common being bass reflex ported designs. With the possible exception of some adam audio tensor active speakers, they all seem to suffer 'to my ears at least' a sort of timing lag or overhang. do other people find this to be the case with ported designs? Or am I gonna have to go the sealed cabinet route? please give me your thoughts, views, and experience. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
For monopoles, there's nothing more accurate than sealed box with critical damping of Q=0.5. This can easily be achieved if the system is active and utilising Linkwitz Transform filter.
__________________
http://gainphile.blogspot.com |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
I'm using a 12" in closed
and calculated specificly for a smooth rounded roll off seems to work nice crisp bass, and deep enough and woofer is barely moving and none of the usual boom boom sound on new recordings I cant't listen to boomy sound for very long I hate that as much as no bass, or thin sound its more about the right balance, than plus minus a few herz but most woofers seems to be designed with BR in mind there's more prestige in very low frequency bass |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: PA
|
I've heard people argue that ported bass sounds really good to them, but no matter what your taste, it takes some time to load up the acoustic reactive network. At least the first half cycle out of the port, at the port tuning frequency, is out of phase with the woofer, and when the woofer stops, the port keeps going for a bit. There's no way to fix that and still get all the frequency response / efficiency benefit of a port. If you're sensitive to bass timing, just avoid them.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sydney
|
__________________
‘today… there lives alongside the twentieth century the tenth or thirteenth. A hundred million people use electricity and still believe in the magic power of signs and exorcisms” Trotsky |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lisbon
|
my opinion is in a system if you have enough bass with sealed boxes that will be the best option ( if drivers allow ). i run an active setup with seas woofers, visaton mids and fountek ribbon tweeters , and a JBL250p self amplified sub . After i covered the sub port bass is much tighter , and i only use 20% of the sub amp power , bass is more then enough and still lot of power available if needed. I use cambridge audio amp for bass , arcam for mids and tube amp for tweeters.I also use a tube preamp.the sub and woofers overlap until 80 hz , after 80hz it´s just woofer , and the sound is very tight never boomy or muddy.
Last edited by lduarte1973; 11th May 2011 at 01:00 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lisbon
|
i agree with you 200 %
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
|
I like a pair of woofers in push-pull configuration--pick your flavor how you want it done, sealed, ported, passive radiator or horn loaded.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Catridge alignment / overhang gauge? Who uses one? | Number13 | Analogue Source | 16 | 8th January 2011 02:12 AM |
| Best tubeamp for metal, tight bass | alspe | Tubes / Valves | 7 | 19th October 2009 11:29 PM |
| overhang adjustment vs. twisting in slots | ilewis33 | Analogue Source | 2 | 17th March 2009 01:55 PM |
| why bass is tight and controlled on SS than chipamps like lm3886? | rhythmdiy | Solid State | 46 | 14th December 2008 01:32 PM |
| The Missing element in Chipamps> how to achieve tight kick drum bass with chipamp? | rhythmdiy | Chip Amps | 28 | 14th August 2008 08:04 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08936 seconds (77.18% PHP - 22.82% MySQL) with 10 queries |