|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: South East UK
|
What will be the effects of adding some acoustic "stuffing" into a sealed subwoofer enclosure as opposed to leaving it empty?
I'd like to maybe extend the bass response down a bit on my DIY sub. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
My guess is that would work if your trying to soften the "boom" that some times sounds sharp effect. or it might sound like you put your sub in mud
i don't know. try it. not a pro.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: South East UK
|
I just reckon it could sound a bit deeper considering how much the driver moves
Any way of doing this? Would stuffing make any difference? |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: South East, UK
|
Hey
Adding stuffing effectivly makes the enclosure seem bigger to the driver, this results in a lower Qtc, meaning the response will be 'smoother' and more drawn out. Typically i have found i can get between 25% and 30% extra effective volume from stuffing. There's loads of info on this around on the forum already (i think ) Also you might want to check out http://www.diysubwoofers.org Heres a pic of interest, its actually for a midrange cone, but the same trends still apply |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: South East UK
|
I'm sorry but I don't really understand all this Qtc business, etc. You'll have to explain it to me in newbie terms!
I just had a bit of a play with the SW Episode 2 DVD and the real low frequencies are certainly there, but considering how much excursion is involved with my poor subwoofer cone, I feel there could be more output, if you see what I mean. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: South East, UK
|
On the graph the red line indicates the frequency response one would get with a larger box (i.e. by adding stuffing to an enclosure)
The dark blue line indicates the response of a smaller box, and the other lines are somewhere between the two Notice that the red line shows higher output at lower frequencies, this is due to the extended, smoother 'curved bit.' As you add more stuffing/make the box bigger this curved bit extends more and more, and also becomes more smooth, giving you greater output at lower frequencies..... However there is a catch (a few others too actually) Adding too much stuffing can have the opposite effect, making the enclosure smaller I strongly suggest u do as much research on the topic as possible before you do anything, that link i gave earlier is a good starting point. (Toying with the sealed.xls file avalible from that site might help clear things up a little) |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Montreal
|
As 0.5 Qtc mean critically damped, do I need to add stuffing and or wall damping ?
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Eugene, OR
|
How large is the woofer?
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: South East UK
|
12"
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Montreal
|
mine is 5.5" alu cone. It is used as a mid/woof unit.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| stuffing. | perpetual | Subwoofers | 3 | 20th April 2005 09:05 AM |
| Stuffing | Dave Jones | Multi-Way | 3 | 4th March 2005 01:48 PM |
| box stuffing | lopan | Multi-Way | 1 | 20th December 2004 01:22 PM |
| Stuffing | Roy Lewis | Multi-Way | 2 | 28th April 2004 06:53 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10154 seconds (77.93% PHP - 22.07% MySQL) with 11 queries |