|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Pune
|
This discussion is with reference to some information available on net and things experienced by me.
1) Based on the information provided by ESP site, Can we say that baffle diffraction correction using series RL, with driver changes characteristic (Qts) of driver along with shaping input signals for correcting baffle diffraction. Is it true? How to handle this? 2) In the thread “Sonic Quality of L-pad attenuator for tweeter” I was trying to discuss this issue. I felt that the sonic quality (clarity) of tweeters were getting blur (it didn’t sound clean or detailed high frequencies). Now while I added RL based baffle correction. To my satellite speakers I found that the graph look quite flat. But the cleanliness in the sound disappeared. The dialogs were not very clear. And I had to put efforts to understand them. I carried this experiment on some other small speakers too and got same result. So does it mean that addition of series resistor changes Qts of driver and same holds true even when apply baffle step diffraction correction. Has anybody experienced same or can help me understanding how to handle this?
__________________
There is always a first time.... |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
The RL method of BSC is the crudest method, generally you don't need R. What you should do usually is oversize the low pass inductor, see links. But FWIW Qts is not affected much as the L "bypasses" the R. R will still interact with the drivers inductance in the midrange. Also FWIW L-pads on tweeters do affect Qts, the source impedance driving the tweeter is the two L-pad values in parallel. Conversely L-padded tweeters are less sensitive to high impedance amplifiers. rgds, sreten. http://sites.google.com/site/undefinition/diy (see FAQs) http://www.zaphaudio.com http://www.rjbaudio.com/Audiofiles/FRDtools.html http://www.rjbaudio.com/ http://speakerdesignworks.com/ http://www.htguide.com/forum/showthread.php4?t=28655 http://www.humblehomemadehifi.com http://www.troelsgravesen.dk/Diy_Lou...r_Projects.htm http://www.quarter-wave.com/ http://www.frugal-horn.com/ http://www.linkwitzlab.com/ http://www.musicanddesign.com/
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
Quote:
1. inserting a resistor in series with a woofer not only increases the Q of the woofer circuit it reduces the damping factor of the amplifier. This will exaggerate any tendency to supurious output at the driver/enclosure's resonant frequency. So called tight bass occurs when F3 of the system is low and system low frequency Q is 0.7 or less. 0.7 gives the lowest F3 without an FR peak. Some experimenters feel putting a small resistor, say 1 ohm in series with a speaker system or woofer will deliberately obtain the effect of increasing Q making a solid state amplifier sound more like a tube amplifier. This works best on high inertial mass woofers such as 12" acoustic suspension designs. 2. In theory using an L pad for a tweeter does not change the crossover frequency. An L Pad consists of two potentiometers, one in series and one in parallel. As one increases in value when you turn the shaft, the other decreases proportionally causing the filter circuit ahead of it to see the same impendance regardless of the L-pad's setting. If the tweeter were a pure resistor whose value was perfectly matched to the L pad, turning it would only affect the ouptut level of the tweeter (by reducing output you may affect what you perceive as clarity.) However, tweeters have inductance as well so the L-pad is not perfect. It is the best cheap solution to changing the output level and usually works fairly well. The use of a potentiometer instead of an L pad is not recommended because it changes the F3 of the filter network. By far the best arrangement is an active crossover network, multi amping, and active multiband equalizers for each driver. A series high pass filter cap for the midrange and tweeter is advisable to prevent damage to them from turn on thumps and other low frequency amplifier disturbances (after the active crossover.) This system design arrangement gives the designer the greatest flexibility in tailoring the response of each driver to the overall system goals. It's also not a bad way to design a speaker system. Once optimal response is found, you can often design a much cheaper if not quite as perfect passive crossover network to match its performance. By comparison the passive network is crude, flawed, and far less flexible but it is much cheaper. It also conforms to audiophile notions of what a speaker system should be. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Pune
|
Sorry, My net was down for quite a long time. So I could not be here. And Thanks for the response I will read the link provided here.
__________________
There is always a first time.... |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Pune
|
"The RL method of BSC is the crudest method, generally you don't need R.
What you should do usually is oversize the low pass inductor, see links. But FWIW Qts is not affected much as the L "bypasses" the R. R will still interact with the drivers inductance in the midrange. Also FWIW L-pads on tweeters do affect Qts, the source impedance driving the tweeter is the two L-pad values in parallel. Conversely L-padded tweeters are less sensitive to high impedance amplifiers. " Whats FWIW ?
__________________
There is always a first time.... |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: England
|
FWIW: For What It's Worth
__________________
Im the guy that speaks in haste, and makes ill conceived theories, thinks math is a necessary evil, but i know something.Sometimes it bugs me, then i then i realise that theres 10 more just the same.So i guess Mulder was right. We are not alone. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Capacitor in series - Resistor across ? | McIntosh Man | Tubes / Valves | 4 | 6th March 2010 01:26 PM |
| Effects on distortion when shorting one coil of a DVC driver? | Spatz | Multi-Way | 2 | 26th February 2010 04:05 PM |
| What resistor power ratings should be used in guitar effects pedals? | Test Electrix | Instruments and Amps | 2 | 4th February 2010 02:22 AM |
| resistor in series or parallel | mace | Multi-Way | 4 | 21st January 2008 09:21 PM |
| Series resistor placement | angsuman | Multi-Way | 5 | 15th July 2006 12:06 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10730 seconds (82.05% PHP - 17.95% MySQL) with 10 queries |