|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
This is a sequel to my question about obtaining 20 Hz - 20 KHz from a two way design...
If you are starting with a clean slate and you can pick your two way speaker complement based on the most non intrusive crossover point, what would that point be? This is a more general question... I am very well aware that multiple priorities will intervene before a suitable compromise is established. For example, a TD15H + Manger/JXR6 HD/B&G RD-75 can be crossed over < 400 Hz, but this bothers me as I know that this frequency range is bang in the center of fundamental tones. I am more comfortable with a large driver handling fundamental frequencies (20 Hz - 800+Hz) as I have experienced this sound and appreciate the scale and authority it demonstrates, even at the lowest volume. However, I have not heard the alternative... And then there is the full range + super tweeter option like the Hammer Dynamics/Zu Audio offerings... So here is the question again... If you could pick a crossover point and design your two way speakers around it, what would it be? I am interested in a general discussion, but all this research is going towards finding the ultimate driver combination for a two way / 20 Hz - 20 KHz / 105 dB average - 115 dB peaks capable system. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London
|
400 hz is far better than 2khz, ie most 2 way crossover points
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Jakarta
|
Quote:
You can define the less obstructive crossover point then go find the most suitable drivers for that crossover point, or you can be flexible with the crossover point and find the "suitable" drivers first. At the end, you have to compare to find out which one is your best. Imo, the later is the most logical way to go because choosing the drivers itself is already difficult with your criteria. And, about crossing at the critical point, yes, it will be a problem if the crossover is of no good quality. But if you do it carefully and try your best, I can see big chance to survive. You have to prepare for yourself some alternatives. For example, alternative 1 will use this driver and this driver with possible crossover point from this to this, alternative 2 will use that driver and that driver with possible crossover point from that to that. Then anyone who has experience with those drivers may chim in and give their opinion about the best way to handle the drivers. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
Quote:
there is no universal ideal xo point you main issue is the two very different drivers that is your problem but do you really need 20hz maybe you should use a lighter coned woofer with shorter Xmax and maybe forget about playing loud |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
150-350 Hz.
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
If you really want it to go very low and have a low cross-over point for the mid band driver , you will have to make it a 3 way ! That makes the mid driver smaller and that might be a good thing !
Driver mix is never an easy thing to do though you could go for successful combinations that have already worked. Could vary from person to person. Cheers.
__________________
AM |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle,Wash.
|
Hi Dave, I completely agree and lower the better. Best Regards, Terry
__________________
"If you have to ask why, then you're probably on the right track." quote from Terry Olson's DIYaudio Forum application |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle,Wash.
|
Here's one I did last year.
It's -3 dB at 33 Hz and 18kHZ crossed over at 450 Hz. I would have liked it lower, but it just worked out better at 450. ![]() Best Regards, TerryO
__________________
"If you have to ask why, then you're probably on the right track." quote from Terry Olson's DIYaudio Forum application |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
TerryO that is a very neat build! What kind of SPL does it deliver, and what is the sensitivity of the system?
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Very nice. How were the drivers connected ? Any crossover details possible ?
Cheers.
__________________
AM |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Crossover point | wiredmonkey | Multi-Way | 1 | 12th May 2008 10:57 AM |
| Ideal operating point of 6sj7 | adamtth | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 6th September 2005 07:42 AM |
| Can you hear the crossover point of a speaker with a well-designed crossover? | 454Casull | Multi-Way | 11 | 2nd April 2004 05:48 AM |
| Point to point crossover soldering | Ilianh | Multi-Way | 9 | 24th December 2002 04:14 AM |
| Ideal HT Speakers (Worried about Subwoofer Crossover) | Ignite | Subwoofers | 2 | 19th October 2001 04:18 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11117 seconds (80.11% PHP - 19.89% MySQL) with 11 queries |