Why NOT build the PE Usher 701 kit ? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28th March 2011, 03:23 PM   #1
percy is offline percy  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: MN
Default Why NOT build the PE Usher 701 kit ?

PE Usher 701 kit
It appears as if it doesn't get any better than this. These are top of the line drivers, professionally finished looking cabinets, its designed by a very well known name in the speaker design industry. Lots of bass in a bookshelf size! Reasonably priced. All you need is a screw driver.

Now I understand this defeats the purpose of true DIY but that aside are there any reasons why anyone would NOT build this kit ? As you might have guessed I am contemplating building this kit. Please advise.
Thanks.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th March 2011, 05:34 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
kipman725's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London/N.lincs
Send a message via MSN to kipman725
not big enough for me. 8" woofer. I use 10" woofers at the moment in a bedroom!
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th March 2011, 07:37 PM   #3
ferynov is offline ferynov  Indonesia
diyAudio Member
 
ferynov's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Borneo
Blog Entries: 3
Send a message via Yahoo to ferynov
nice kit and cheap ... if near in my country i will buy it ...
__________________
-Best Regards-
diy blog
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th March 2011, 08:59 PM   #4
infinia is offline infinia  United States
diyAudio Member
 
infinia's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
Quote:
Please advise
Just Do It

design notes Parts Express DIY Project

PS for less vanilla style - PE offers this kit in curvy boxes Dayton Audio UA701CCK Usher Speaker Kit Curved Cherry
__________________
like four million tons of hydrogen exploding on the sun
like the whisper of the termites building castles in the dust
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2011, 01:08 AM   #5
blue934 is offline blue934  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
blue934's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Salmon Arm, B.C.
i built this design a few yrs ago. i really enjoy the woofer (fav so far of everything i have used) but there was a lot of hash around the crossover point, especially w/electric guitar. Jay Kim addressed this with a modded crossover. he dropped the crossover point, added a notch on the woofer and added BSC. this created a totally new package - very enjoyable. i think there are better designs using this woofer and the P version of it but the modded kit is still a good design. unfortunately Jay's site has been down for a yr. if you are interested, i can get you the documentation for the new crossover. he adds a few pieces to the stock version so the kit isn't wasted.

good luck
david
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2011, 01:36 AM   #6
infinia is offline infinia  United States
diyAudio Member
 
infinia's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
nahh I'll have to disagree about hash at the crossover. The stock design is well thought out and better than Jay's. I don't think jay ever measured a real design! all his stuff I've ever seen was only on simulated paper, on-axis. ask him yerself he admits this openly.
BTW The stock design has plenty of BSC (5-6dB) as I've analyzed it. The woofer in the stock design uses a concave dustcap on purpose, ie for the crossover off-axis acoustic performance it's part of the total crossover design. Jay seems to miss this fact by choosing to substitute the P version. I emailed him about this and it still didn't sink in.
I wonder what Jay was selling? I find it hard to believe he is claiming his design is better than the Man's.
__________________
like four million tons of hydrogen exploding on the sun
like the whisper of the termites building castles in the dust

Last edited by infinia; 29th March 2011 at 01:46 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2011, 04:33 AM   #7
blue934 is offline blue934  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
blue934's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Salmon Arm, B.C.
well, i'm not going to argue the details, but i've built both designs and i preferred Jay's.

david
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2011, 01:02 PM   #8
percy is offline percy  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: MN
I was eyeing the curved cabinet as well, but more for function than form. If the benefits of a curved cab are real(audible) then I will go for it.

I'd much prefer the 'A' version over the 'P' version. Its not intuitive but if you play around with the box modeling a bit you will realize that the A version has exactly the same low end response as the P version, but only with less distortion, more power handling and more xmax. The 'default' or initial model that most popular box modeling applications arrive at mislead you into thinking the P version has more low end response than the A version. Atleast thats what I think.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2011, 01:36 PM   #9
Alex M is offline Alex M  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Hampshire, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by infinia View Post
Just Do It

design notes Parts Express DIY Project
I'm sure that this has been commented on before, but Usher's drivers look very much like those in certain Scan Speak ranges (and they don't seem to have tried hard in thinking up driver model numbers either).

For instance, the USHER 9930-20 1" TEXTILE DOME TWEETER looks rather like the Scan D2905-9300, while the USHER 8945A 7" CARBON FIBER/PAPER WOOFER also rminds me strongly of the 18W/4545.

Is there any formal relation between Usher and Scan, or are the former a less than subtle rip=off?

Alex
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2011, 01:41 PM   #10
infinia is offline infinia  United States
diyAudio Member
 
infinia's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
Yes the bass should be the same in identical alignments. The P (pole peice) version woofer does have its advantages. IMO slightly less distortion and maybe a little less compression due to better VC cooling.
__________________
like four million tons of hydrogen exploding on the sun
like the whisper of the termites building castles in the dust
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Murphy Usher two way or PE D'Appolito vaughn Multi-Way 0 27th March 2009 10:20 PM
best amp/kit to match with Usher 520s wendelltate Class D 1 30th September 2008 03:03 AM
Bass Reflex port for Usher 701 kit nippontiger Multi-Way 7 16th September 2008 03:11 PM
Opinions On Parts Express Usher 701 Kit? JimOfOakCreek Multi-Way 2 19th February 2008 08:49 PM
Usher 2.5 DIY Kit JCD Multi-Way 2 8th September 2005 09:27 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:46 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2