Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28th March 2011, 12:53 PM   #31
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Midland, Ontario
Hi prickears, on several occasions I have read that a properly tuned "max flat" BR has an equivalent closed box. Qtc of 1.1 if that's what you're looking for. I suppose a "mistuned " box would produce a different "Qtc" as we'll as the associated response anomalies.
__________________
JEREMY M_________________________________
I like it loud, BUT NOT TOO LOUD!.... Hey do you hear that high pitched ringing sound ?
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th March 2011, 01:49 PM   #32
diyAudio Member
 
prickears's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Hamilton, victoria
Thanx Jeremy
It is quite difficult to find the info on this. A deliberately 'mistuned' box is no longer mistuned unless you get it wrong!!!

infinia
That was the bit I am concerned about, leaning the bass out too much to find the extra bit of extension. I guess that's what makes it tricky, trying to balance this with the natural room gain.
I have four of these drivers, so they are a little bit bigger than their specs would suggest

Their job is to keep pace with four P13s, in a three/way, (active and tri-amped) although I haven't worked out exactly where to cross them yet. I'm really just weighing up my options and trying to find a good compromise.

Looking at your second chart post, again, the orange trace vs standard max flat, the orange is never more than about 2.2 db down between 100 and 80(?) hz, but then hangs in longer as room gain *should* be starting to give it a bit of help. Well thats the theory anyway. The fact that it differs from system to system and room to room is a bonus for a DIYer if not a headache at times!!

Mick.
__________________
Making stuff 'idiot proof', Just breeds more effective idiots.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th March 2011, 04:50 PM   #33
infinia is offline infinia  United States
diyAudio Member
 
infinia's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
Quote:
That was the bit I am concerned about, leaning the bass out too much to find the extra bit of extension. I guess that's what makes it tricky, trying to balance this with the natural room gain.
yes the compromise of in between boxes, I like to go with designs that give options on the fly, like adding new ports, stuffing, plugs.
I like how the 11 liter 42 Hz box response tracks the slope of a closed box yet gives almost the same extension as the max flat BR at -10 dB. Group delay is tamed (monotonic) over this lower "pass band" as well.

About Q matching
What you could do is compare your modified BR designs step response to various closed box Qs in Unibox, and tune to that.
__________________
like four million tons of hydrogen exploding on the sun
like the whisper of the termites building castles in the dust

Last edited by infinia; 28th March 2011 at 05:07 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th March 2011, 10:24 PM   #34
diyAudio Member
 
prickears's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Hamilton, victoria
Quote:
Originally Posted by infinia View Post

About Q matching
What you could do is compare your modified BR designs step response to various closed box Qs in Unibox, and tune to that.
That might be the way to go I think.

The 11L 42hz Box has a 25.5 cm port even though it is only 5 cm dia (can you hear me breathing!?) so it can't really work in the real word. I know 23l works well, so I might just tweak the port and stuffing from there till it looks good.
The 23L boxes I already built have the port 'built in', so it is quite a pain to try to change the port length, but 23l was still quite boomy, so tweaking the port for a 23-25 litre box I think could be the way to go.

Thanx for your help/ideas/input thus far infinia !!!

cheers Mick.
__________________
Making stuff 'idiot proof', Just breeds more effective idiots.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2011, 01:13 AM   #35
infinia is offline infinia  United States
diyAudio Member
 
infinia's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
Yes small boxes with unwieldy long ports are perfect for passive radiators , deja vu all over again. haha

Since you mentioned going active, how about going all the way, ie with a small sealed alignment with an LT equalizer? then you dial in the real Q by changing out a few R's and C's.
__________________
like four million tons of hydrogen exploding on the sun
like the whisper of the termites building castles in the dust

Last edited by infinia; 29th March 2011 at 01:42 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2011, 02:15 AM   #36
diyAudio Member
 
prickears's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Hamilton, victoria
I did once try them in a 12 litre sealed box, but the estrogen levels of that system were a little too high........
They love a ported box, they are just a whisker tricky to tune is all, having said that, I would prefer to have the bass a little lean, rather than too boomy. Then there is nothing worse than a cliff face roll off, one bass note is loud and clear the next lower note all but disappears, I REALLY hate that.
I will get around to earning enough coin to build a proper sub one of these days.
__________________
Making stuff 'idiot proof', Just breeds more effective idiots.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2011, 08:23 AM   #37
just another
diyAudio Moderator
 
wintermute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sydney
Blog Entries: 22
Hi Mick, sorry this reply is a bit late! The best I've found is akabak, it had multiple alignments for BR and shows you the transient response among other things, I'd say that selecting the alignment that gives you the fastest transient response might be what you are looking for!

Akabak Simulator

Its got a brutal learning curve if you want to use it to it's full extent, but should be pretty straight forward to just get some alignments out of it if you have a look at the dummys guide posted above

Hope you are well, and recovering/recovered from the injuries.

Tony.
__________________
Any intelligence I may appear to have is purely artificial!
Some of my photos
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2011, 09:05 PM   #38
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Wellington
The "ported.xls" spreadsheet from diysubwoofers.org allows you to enter the room response curve (resonances etc) and show the resultant response. It also has several filter options and room gain compensation. I use it a lot when working on designs outside the classic alignments.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Designing Box lamsv Subwoofers 4 5th September 2010 04:37 PM
Speaker BOX program? jmar Multi-Way 1 22nd December 2007 03:30 PM
Designing a box dan50 Subwoofers 2 18th September 2007 05:58 AM
What program will allow you to input the T/S parameters and make a speaker box design kehi Multi-Way 3 11th December 2003 01:05 PM
Help with designing a box tom1356 Multi-Way 11 17th October 2002 04:45 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:10 AM.

Page generated in 0.11366 seconds (79.01% PHP - 20.99% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio