|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New Zealand
|
Hi
There's been some discussion from time to time on side firing woofers but not enough for me to make an opinion, so... I had an idea to use the following drivers in a 3 way config: 1 x Peerless 850146 10" CSX side fired on a 400mm baffle 2 x Peerless 850488 5" HDS mids on a 220mm front baffle 1 x Peerless or Vifa tweeter (not sure yet) XO for the woof/mid at around 125hz, mid/tweet around 3500. What are the design problems I'm likely to face here? Feedback much appreciated. Mos |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: North London
|
The wavelength of the sound at 125Hz is nearly 9 feet (2.6m) so you shouldn't have any problems with a side firing woofer but, if you're going this way, I would suggest a 3rd or 4th order low-pass filter on it.
Steve |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Leuven
|
Why isn't it a problem 7V? because those frequencies aren't directional?
It looks like a great way of making a more elegant cabinet. The Mission 782 have side firing woofers. Maybe it's just a coincidence, but most magazines rate them high, apart from the bass that seems a bit odd... It didn't really sound odd to me when I listend to them in a store though. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New Zealand
|
7V
I was goning with a 2nd order. The values are large and I'm sure 2nd order will be fine. Quite frankly, side firers seem to polarise opinion. Mos |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
well if u did a search, you probably would have found my questions about it before i made mine
similarly, mine had a single 1" dome tweeter, 2x5" mids and 1x8". i went for the 8" because my enclosures were big enough, and a 10" (at least one i could afford) didn't have very good response in that size enclosure. by the way, i used all Response drivers. i've tried a couple of things with mine to get good sound out of them. i originally put the mid/tweet xo @ 3.5k 2nd order. i then didn't bother crossing the 8"s over, but just ran both the mid/tweet combo, and 8" parallel in full range. i did this because i hadn't gotten around to purchasing components for the rest of the crossover, and i was thinking about bi-amping. i am still yet to try it like this with the 8" facing inward, but facing outwards there was no imaging problem. i then, using a active xo built into my pc, ran them bi-amped. i can change the xo freq variably with a slider. it will depend on your driver sensitivity and response, but i found around 130Hz to be good. this was because my 5"s (in a sealed enclosure) response started to get around -1dB at this point. i would honestly like the 8" to be on the front, but a 10" like you're using would be a little big. i however want the small front profile of these cabinets of mine (around 16cm wide externally). i should also mention that my 8"s are also sealed, but the response down low is fine for music, and for movies i have my sub (so ultimately i'm running a 4-way system for movies ).
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: North London
|
Quote:
![]() Quote:
Yes, this issue does polarise opinions. I suspect that this is as much psychological as actual, if the implementation is right. |
||
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
IIRC, NHT uses a second order from the woofer in their well-regarded 3.3. You might even think about copying their idea of a tilted baffle and long, wall-loaded cabinet.
In most side-firing designs, the woofer loading is near the floor, a good thing for bass smoothness (see Roy Allison).
__________________
If there's a sucker born every minute, where do the rest of them come from? |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Connecticut, The Nutmeg State
|
The difference is in center-to-center spacing.
If the centers of the bass unit and midrange are ½ wavelength apart at the crossover frequency, there will be cancellation there. If they are ¼ wavelength apart there, there might be some cancellation, like 3 dB. If they are much less than ¼ apart, you don't have to worry.
__________________
"A friend will help you move. A really good friend will help you move a body." -Anonymous |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Down firing vs side firing? | Tee-Bruce | Subwoofers | 36 | 26th August 2009 06:32 AM |
| side firing sub | chainenoble | Subwoofers | 2 | 23rd October 2006 06:35 PM |
| Woofer: side firing pair vs front firing? | tcpip | Multi-Way | 13 | 9th September 2005 02:13 PM |
| side firing sub | chainenoble | Subwoofers | 2 | 29th August 2005 03:29 AM |
| side firing woofers | ogp | Multi-Way | 2 | 9th January 2002 01:44 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |