|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
Hi all!
I have a 8" carbon fibre midwoofer that behaves fairly well when it comes to cone breakup problems. Originally this driver is intended to run without any crossover at all. While this works pretty well, I often find the midband to be a tad too loud relatively to the lower frequencies. To adjust the tweeter level I can put a small resistor in series, but to lower only the midband range of the midwoofer I had the idea of using a coil (say, 1,2mH), paralleled with a resistor (say, 2,2R) in series with the midwoofer. This way I would have a driver "without" crossover but with a slightly recessed sound pressure level in the mid frequency range. Any thoughts about this idea? Does the amp run into trouble with this? Are there any odd phase shift phenomenons? Reason why I ask this is because I find this idea quite good, but I never ever saw this realized in any crossover of any loudspeaker before! Thanks a lot! Martin Last edited by martinbls; 21st March 2011 at 09:59 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
What you do is a shelving filter. Nothing to say against
it, if indicated and commonly used in many loudspeakers too .... You additionally may try compensating the driver's voice coil inductivity and see, whether you can use a different alignment of the L R circuit, maybe the inductor can be made considerably smaller. That does not mean, compensating the VC inductivity is necessarily "better" with your special combination. It is an option. Cheers |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
Hi Oliver,
thanks for your reply! I tried a zobel network for impedance linearisation and really, the coil can be much smaller that way (in my case about half the value). But even though there are benefits when using a smaller coil, there are some drawbacks. I used proper values for the zobel (both calculated and measured), but the sound of the driver got more liveless and uninvolving! A larger coil and no zobel always resulted in a more open and exciting sound. Thanks again! Martin |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What happens if you put a resistor parallel to the potentiometer? | wwenze | Everything Else | 5 | 25th June 2010 06:39 AM |
| resistor in series or parallel | mace | Multi-Way | 4 | 21st January 2008 09:21 PM |
| Parallel LM3886 output resistor(s) | markiemrboo | Chip Amps | 4 | 22nd July 2007 09:03 PM |
| car midwoofer vs. home midwoofer | sma | Multi-Way | 1 | 18th December 2005 03:51 AM |
| Dual Coil Resistor/Atlas | loudnclear | Subwoofers | 3 | 12th March 2005 02:46 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07080 seconds (69.14% PHP - 30.86% MySQL) with 10 queries |