|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Seattle
|
I know you're not supposed to place speakers near the rear wall, but if you have no choice, is there any way to mitigate the consequences? I'm thinking of absorbing panels of some kind; something that wouldn't look too bad unless there are other options. My problem is especially bad because they will be open baffle. And yes, cost is a factor.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Taiwan
|
What 'consequences' ? What do you get ?
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
not optimal, but might work ok
I did that for a few years but no closer than 1-2 feet(50cm) to back wall hell, you could try to lean the baffle up against the wall even that may work, maybe even better |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
|
Conventional speakers away from the wall may sound less boomy. But it's not just the rear wall, it's all. Try to get different distance to rear wall, floor, ceiling, and to the side walls, and to the other speaker. That keep resonances from reinforcing each other.
Now, open baffle is a different story. But I think you are contradicting your own aims. Open baffle is usually trying to get an "open" planar-like sound...but part of that whole deal is NOT being near walls which will make reflections close on the heels of the frontward radiation. You could put absorbent material all over the wall behind them, but it will only work from the midrange up (IF you buy GOOD material) and it really kind of defeats the purpose of having an open baffle speaker at that point. If you're absorbing the rear wave, you might as well have an enclosure, eh? |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Seattle
|
Okay, I guess I get the idea. Maybe I'll have to rearrange the whole situation because I do want to try OB's.
Do you think that sweeping the room with REW and an appropriate DSP EQ would help a situation like that? |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SSB4 reflex project: massive amount of rear wall absorbent!!! | mondogenerator | Multi-Way | 2 | 5th November 2009 11:09 PM |
| So, why not in-wall speakers? | wigginjs | Multi-Way | 4 | 20th August 2007 02:59 AM |
| Rear speakers, yes or no? | MatthewR6 | Car Audio | 14 | 23rd June 2004 02:59 AM |
| searching software to switch front speakers to rear and rear to front!-dolby surround | MCM | Everything Else | 6 | 6th February 2004 09:29 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08115 seconds (72.69% PHP - 27.31% MySQL) with 10 queries |