|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#21 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
|
I think with miniDSP you go:
44.1->DAC->ADC->SRC(48)->processing->DAC Or you can send it the SPDIF (if you have a miniDIGI) and cut out the first DAC->ADC pair, and it still does SRC. I don't klnow if the onboard SRC will be better or worse than a software sRC at source. The GroundSound units will process at 96kHz, but I don't think they have an SPDIF feed option. |
|
|
|
#22 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
Lynx can be slaved to the DA converter that's a nice way of doiing things.
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Both miniDSP and the DCX2496 can be used with digital inputs. No need for the A/D conversion. miniDSP runs at 48Khz and the DCX at 96Khz, AFAIK.
__________________
Take the Speaker Voltage Test! |
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/digit...-new-post.html dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: white plains, ny
|
Quote:
OK so miniDSP offers a better precision than kx-project because it processes in 24bits but they both run at 48kHz. Does miniDSP upsample the signal on the output? |
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
|
Quote:
Note that you need a miniDIGI to get SPDIF input to a miniDSP, and that means you can't use the handy off-the-shelf enclosure. The miniDSP/miniDIGI combo is $160. I'm wondering if its worth the hassle of building a custom enclosure and power supply and using these, or whether it makes more sense to just put a fanless Atom PC behind each speaker and use my choice of PC sound card. Seemed like overkill when it first popped into mind, but once you factor in pain of building enclosures etc its tempting to consider GroundSound, and then its tempting to consider that you can pretty much build a PC and MAudio solution for the same money, give or take. Madness! |
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kent
|
What do you guys think is the best (most powerful yet still cool) CPU for a mini-ITX system to do crossover duties? You have a few options like a dual core Atom, some of the lower power i5 chips or Phenom x4, Athlon II chips from AMD. A powerful 'mobile' processor seems like it would be good but I don't see they are easy to get hold of and don't fit most ITX motherboards.
Low power chips obviously mean the PSU would do less work and is easier to cool without a fan. |
|
|
|
#28 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Upstate NY
|
It depends on your chosen software's requirements.
I have Frequency Allocator running on an old 3GHz Pentium D with 1 GB of ram (three way XO, although I don't think it affects CPU usage much). Even when running multiple other applications simultaneously, I haven't had a playback glitch. Building a mini-ITX box for Frequency Allocator, I'd go with the lowest powered processor I could find. If you want to use another program, take a look at the user support forum. There are likely to be a number of "how much CPU power do I need for a standalone" threads. |
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
|
Quote:
Seems you can get fanless dual core Pine Trail at 1.8GHz for 60 quid here: mini-itx.com - store - Intel Atom Mini-ITX boards but you'll need choose a case and PSU solution carefully to run a PCI card - the boards with integrated power probably code out cheaper (eg with a M300, albeit useless CF - expect to boot off a USB key). Absolutely no idea how well BruteFIR would run on that, although we've had 10 years of CPU evolution since Torsten started on this - and gcc got a good deal better at optimising too. But don't listen to me - my current ITX is a server and definitely not silent! I'm attracted to the M350 case for convection cooling but it does imply a USB or firewire sound card. If you want silent/passive cooling, you might want to consider a PSU-less microtower case so there is air over the motherboard rather than something small with a PCI card laying right over the CPU heatsink. You haven't said how much software you aim to do - sure the path of least resistence isn't to keep that LynxAES and just run Windows off an SSD with Frequency Allocator Light? Won't do all the magic phase stuff, but Thuneau can probably advise what sort of CPU you'd need for teh full-fat version. |
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kent
|
I plan to have 8 channels, each using FIR phase linear crossovers and inversion IIR EQ to smooth the response of the drivers. I also want delay to be as low pas possible. Quite a heavy load I suppose.
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Wanted: Software for PC Multiscope 2 | Zero Cool | Equipment & Tools | 6 | 27th October 2010 09:41 PM |
| Vinyl ripping software help for PC | Cycline3 | Analogue Source | 5 | 28th November 2009 08:08 AM |
| ### Searching for PC Audio Lab Software | small_boy | Everything Else | 2 | 8th March 2008 12:31 AM |
| pc software | rkreim | Digital Source | 8 | 10th December 2007 08:01 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |