|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
|
Looking for information on this, I can only find stories relating to car loudspeakers, but they don't delve into the finer details of distortion & cone break-up.
I was wondering what are the down-sides associated with elliptical cone drivers when it comes to very low distortion multi-way speaker systems? Do they have inherent problems, or are they just more costly to make with no real advantages besides space-saving? I imagine an elliptical cone will always be less ridgid than an equivalent area or mass circular.
__________________
Steerpike's Toybox |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
In fact i can see a lot of advantages in elliptical ones.
For a given membrane area the horizontal dispersion can be made wider than with a circular one. The elliptical shape can contribute to cone breakup occuring more smoothly. Breakup cannot be circumvented either, but there are many elliptical fullrangers having a good midrange performance. Cone material and design of surround are equally important than with circular ones of course ... Elliptical ones may be used to make up line arrays having a better coverage of the line shaped total membrane area than those made up from circular ones. Unfortunately high quality elliptical designs are quite uncommon for most manufacturers, maybe because they are considered "looking uncool" and are associated with "cheap radio and TV drivers". Simply a mistake. I once ran a TB W69 ("semi elliptical") SUBWOOFER made of thick paper up to 2Khz crossover frequency (equalized of course). It performs well, there are many specialized midrangers performing a lot worse ... Kind Regards Last edited by LineArray; 21st January 2011 at 08:19 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lincoln, Missouri
|
I have always liked the sound of an ellipitcal driver due to the characteristics noted above. They also can be fitted into towers or other odd spaces easier than their round counter parts.
In the March 2010 issue of Audio Express there is an article on building a transmission line using a full range 6X9 speaker. It produces some decent sound for its low cost. Back in the ancient 1970s both RCA and Maganavox offered console stereos using 9 X 15 inch oval woofers. The sounded great and could really take high bass levels with out break up. McGee Radio bought a bunch of them on the surplus market and sold them for $10.00 each. If you ever see a pair on Ebay try and get them as they could make a unique woofer for your next project. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
|
Well thanks for the encoaging info. I have two pairs of 6"x4" that I want to try as mid-rangers; so it seems as if they can be quite competent.
__________________
Steerpike's Toybox |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
|
Steerpike: I am answering in regards to your post on AVForums South Africa. I have a mint condition Philips 22-GA-146 that I am looking to sell if you are interested. It was my grandfathers, cosmetically it is perfect as it has not been touched and has been kept stored properly for years. I have many photos, if you are interested. Please email me at patrickdarling1@gmail.com. The reason I am posting on here is AVforums will not accept my registration, for some reason. Let me know, thanks.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07736 seconds (75.46% PHP - 24.54% MySQL) with 10 queries |