Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 29th December 2010, 10:18 PM   #1
AllenB is offline AllenB  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Default What technical issue ruins sibilants?

I'm referring to that sound where a singers tongue seems to bounce, sounding like it is spittle covered at the time (sorry for the image )

I've narrowed it down to four possibilities that I can think of (these are only suggestions)

1. It's just there in the recordings (as I certainly don't notice any on some recordings)

2. A group delay between woofer and tweeter.

3. Power response irregularities around the crossover with flat on axis response.

4. Frequency response irregularities around the crossover.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th December 2010, 10:29 PM   #2
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Blog Entries: 1
In order of probability, mikes, recording/mastering eq, tweeter.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2010, 12:16 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Godzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New York
I went full range driver specifically because of this sibilance issue. There must be other ways of minimizing it even in multi-way systems. If the response has a rise around 2 - 4 kHz there is sibilance. Probably also related to crossover issues for sure in many cases. The tweeter isn't always to blame, it can be the woofer/midrange driver breaking up around those frequencies. Sometimes it's on the recording. Once you minimize it it's easy to spot it on other speakers/sound systems. When it's gone or minimized you don't miss it!
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2010, 01:14 AM   #4
Pano is offline Pano  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
Pano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: North Carolina
Blog Entries: 4
Bad crossovers can add it to an otherwise good recording. So can frequency peaks not related to the x-over.

A bad crossover can also give a singer a lisp. Pretty funny.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2010, 01:32 AM   #5
sreten is offline sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
Hi,

Poor distortion performance from any part of the chain can ruin sibilants.
Sometimes this can even be on the recordings, treble peaks don't help.

So called "Exciters" used on pop recordings can be a cause of sibilance.

Basically its either distortion or treble peaking accentuating the harmonics.

rgds, sreten.

There are also the much rarer self descriptive terms shibilant and thibilant.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann
When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow

Last edited by sreten; 30th December 2010 at 01:41 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2010, 01:49 AM   #6
AllenB is offline AllenB  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by panomaniac View Post
Bad crossovers can add it to an otherwise good recording.
The biggest variable in my system is the recordings. They're just all over the place, so I'm thinking the recording chain is mostly to blame. My 3-4k region is down 2dB.

However, I don't expect every recording to trigger a specific fault in my system, so I'm still suspicious, but I do believe that the problems I hear on some recordings seem greater than any problem I'm able to clearly identify in my system.

So how would I confirm a bad crossover? My on axis response is +-2dB over the central regions (with 1/3 octave smoothing) with the right trends about it. Off axis has recieved attention. Would I find it in the phase data? My drivers are not time aligned by any means but they add well all the same.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2010, 01:55 AM   #7
sreten is offline sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
Hi, for subtle issues your talking frequency and power response, rgds, sreten.

Tweeters used distortion wise lower than they go, can and will melt your ears.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann
When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2010, 04:24 AM   #8
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzilla View Post
I went full range driver specifically because of this sibilance issue.
Ironically, there are Lowthers...
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2010, 04:29 AM   #9
Pano is offline Pano  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
Pano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: North Carolina
Blog Entries: 4
Phase can do it, or as sreten mentions, distortion. Those harmonics don't show up on the FR plot, but you can sure hear them. So it could be distortion on the low end of the tweeter's range, and maybe phase issues. It isn't easy to solve.

Do you have a good pair of headphones to compare to?
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2010, 12:54 PM   #10
AllenB is offline AllenB  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
With regards to distortion, I'm using good compression tweeters at domestic levels. They are also crossed well below the normal sibilance region.

My system bears quite a resemblance to my headphones ($100, made using FEA, not too bad) mainly in the areas of timbreal balance and the dry acoustic.

My biggest technical concern about my system is that the tweeter is over six inches behind the woofer.

Currently about a quarter of all recordings on my system sound better than I have ever heard them anywhere before (BTW, thanks to knowledge gained at this forum), and I could probably double that if I would loosen up to a nice EQ...I've heard many a bad recording sound much better on a system that by its character gives away the fact that it is thoroughly EQed. Per song settings would be even better.

One thing that I have found by my incorrectly using so many dome tweeters in the past (as opposed to using dome tweeters correctly) is that when you stress their low end, and you mis-match the power responses of the drivers you get a certain character that highlights the crossover in a bad way and you can always hear it. The recordings that sound good on these systems don't hide the fault so much as they exploit it, which is really just a coincidental thing.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What do you use? Not technical but relative. hdlcx2 Tubes / Valves 11 4th August 2008 08:12 PM
What track for realistic sibilants? JoeM Music 0 29th January 2008 12:24 PM
Sub technical spec. globalweb Subwoofers 11 28th October 2006 06:49 AM
Technical Reviewer jwatts Everything Else 0 4th April 2006 05:47 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:55 AM.

Page generated in 0.10970 seconds (77.71% PHP - 22.29% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio