|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
|
I recently purchased some damping material which I intend to use for lining the walls of a ported mid bass enclosure. Specs are here:
Sonic Barrier 3/4" 3-Layer Damping Material w/PSA 18" x 24" | Parts-Express.com My enclosure will require about 480 cubic inches of this material. I do not know how to appropriately account for the loss of cabinet volume due to this lining. Being a porous acoustic foam composite, I presume that the actual volume loss will be somewhat less than if I considered the lining as a solid, but I am unaware of any specs or rules of thumb to guide this estimate. I would appreciate a response from anyone who has used this material in their own designs, or who could suggest how I might best account for the lining volume. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
|
I haven''t used this, but if I had to guess, I might subtract the thickness of the back two layers (to the darker strip) and ignore the thicker foam layer. you might model the cabinet with the volume reduced thusly and decide whether it makes any appreciable difference.
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan Science is a way of thinking much more than it is a body of knowledge. --Carl Sagan Last edited by Ron E; 27th December 2010 at 06:28 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
|
Thanks for that. The difference in the model isn't huge, but it is there. I'll consider the foam volume at 50% of apparent thickness and tune accordingly.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
|
Quote:
It won't make a huge difference in your simulation but it is David S. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
|
I have heard of this for sealed enclosures, but I am using the material only to line the walls of a vented enclosure - not to stuff it. The 480 cubic inches is not the enclosure volume, but rather the calculated volume of the installed lining, when considered at 100% (i.e. as a solid). The enclosure itself has a total volume of 1900 cubic inches. I want the lining to assist damping of the panels, as well as to eliminate standing waves and internal reflections. The application is a PA mid bass (55 Hz tuning) - this is in contrast to the adjacent sealed midrange chamber which has no lining but is loosely stuffed with fiberglass insulation. In that case, I could see the stuffing increasing the apparent volume, but the frequency response of my midrange driver within its active passband is particularly insensitive to the enclosure volume, so I ignored any effect that the fiberglass has.
As far as the PE Sonic Barrier material is concerned, you think that this would increase the apparent volume of a vented enclosure? Looking at the description, it is a 3/4" laminate of 1/4" of foam, an impermeable barrier, and another 1/2" of foam, so considering it at 50% of its outside volume seems reasonable, as a component to be subtracted from the enclosure volume to get the effective volume. If it increases apparent volume however, then I should just ignore it completely? |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi, you can simply ignore it, it will increase effective volume a little, rgds, sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
|
Quote:
The inner vinyl layer is of minimal volume (a mass layer), so the total material is primarily compressible foam. David S. Last edited by speaker dave; 29th December 2010 at 06:24 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sydney
|
Unibox lets you sim the effects of different ammounts of stuffing
__________________
‘today… there lives alongside the twentieth century the tenth or thirteenth. A hundred million people use electricity and still believe in the magic power of signs and exorcisms” Trotsky |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
Due to the impermeable layer that 5mm part will probably decrease box somewhat. The 10mm layer above will increase box volume somwhat, overall IMO it will be similar. rgds, sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
I'm with sreten on this one.
Besides at $6 per ft^2 I am thinking bracing is not only cheaper but more effective? It's also solid so you can simply deduct it. 480 cubic inches. Is this correct. That means less than two pieces as shown in the link? |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| My cabinet volume is too high | dublin78 | Multi-Way | 6 | 31st October 2007 07:36 PM |
| Volume Adjustment - Please Help | Scott_drake | Solid State | 0 | 12th August 2006 02:02 PM |
| calculating subwoofer volume when lining walls | justinc | Subwoofers | 3 | 5th September 2005 11:40 PM |
| Calculating Cabinet Volume? | kestrel200 | Multi-Way | 10 | 16th January 2005 12:23 PM |
| Increasing cabinet volume ?? | Flappytango | Multi-Way | 7 | 6th March 2004 01:15 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10209 seconds (80.58% PHP - 19.42% MySQL) with 10 queries |