|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
|
I'm in the middle of building a pair of Zaph's BAMTMs and instead of going with the Seas tweeters, I went with the HiVi SD1.1-A found here. I am regretting not going with the Seas now but I hope the HiVi will produce a reasonable quality response. I know the frequency response is not similar to the Seas along with some other things, before I goto order the crossover components, I was wondering if there was any alterations to the component list I should make? Any help would be appreciated.
And on another note, my searches have been coming back empty on what type of amplifier to employ for these speakers? I'd love to build one and I am all about the DIY, I just haven't had any hands on experience with audio fidelity of this amplitude. Thanks in advance! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Irving, TX
|
I would save my money for the Seas tweeter. What makes the design work is the ability of that tweeter to cross over low. Not only will this require a complete redesign of the crossover, I doubt your tweeter will play low enough to work with the woofers. It is a great design that sounds fantastic with 75 - 100 watts of clean power.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
Your asking for trouble changing the tweeter, I don't recommend it at all. Its not totally unworkable with the SD1.1 but some redesign and modelling would be required for the new sensitivity and series resistor value. There is no guarantee the SD1.1 can handle the same maximum levels. Any decent 4 ohm capable amplifier should be fine. FWIW buying a used and rebuilding it is far easier that starting from scratch, and far cheaper. rgds, sreten. http://sites.google.com/site/undefinition/diy http://www.zaphaudio.com http://www.rjbaudio.com/Audiofiles/FRDtools.html http://www.rjbaudio.com/
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow Last edited by sreten; 26th December 2010 at 05:09 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
|
Would that work? Or am I missing something.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Upstate NY
|
Yes you are missing something. The tweeter filter is only part of the crossover. If you found a crossover that gives the same frequency and phase response as Zaph designed into his on the same baffle width, you could substitute it. That is not the case with the filter that you linked to.
Notice that Zaph gets a 4th order 1500 Hz response out of his filter. The one you linked to rolls the tweeter off at about 2300 Hz third order You'd end up with a big hole in the response. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
|
Ok that makes sense. I will have to find a tweeter with a lower frequency response.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Bassman Schematic Alterations | MellowTone | Tubes / Valves | 11 | 17th June 2009 03:48 PM |
| A Beginners Guide to Enclosure Alterations | Bork | Multi-Way | 7 | 12th January 2009 02:10 AM |
| BAMTM impedance. | 318Shawn | Multi-Way | 9 | 4th October 2008 11:22 PM |
| Bose 301- improvements and alterations. | cyteen | Multi-Way | 25 | 19th November 2004 01:29 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07963 seconds (83.26% PHP - 16.74% MySQL) with 10 queries |