|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
|
@sreten: The enclosures I have now are bass reflex. I want to try a sealed enclosure for the reasons mentioned earlier, which left me very curious.
@DualTriode: I think the same way as you. I prefer the sound of sealed enclosures. And for that, I have two 15-inch subwoofers. But on the other hand, I like to use the Peerless, Without the Urgent Need for subs. As well I said before, I do not look good bass in them. Just looking for a bass that accompanies it. The only thing that interests me is that I can hear the range of 55-65Hz in a fairly decent way. It is not my intention to get more down in frequency with these monitors. |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
F3 is not the issue, F6 and F10 matter far more in reality, and optimising for these gives you a far better transient response. This driver in small sealed will not have good bass, vented done properly IMO will get down to 40Hz or so with a large maximum SPL / lower distortion advantage, I cannot see in this case sealed being preferable in any sensible sense. rgds, sreten. I've got nothing against sealed, but not these drivers without a sub. Detuning your ports with a foam lining is by far IMO your best bet.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow Last edited by sreten; 26th December 2010 at 09:13 PM. |
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sacramento
|
Quote:
Hello,I will jump in with more opinion. It depends on time place and purpose. Mood music for the women in your life does not need chest pounding bass decibels. Here is a thought: build the bass reflex boxes and provide the ability to blank off the ports for the times you may want to roll into the 15 inch bins. Something you likely already have in mind is the “cabin effect”. Moderate to smallish rooms have the bass increase in real db’s due to the relationship between the wavelength and room size. The Peerless may perform better than they appear on paper in the real space. DT All just for fun! |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
|
I like the idea of making a new bass reflex, with the possibility of plugging the ports. Could make about 13 liters, maybe a little less, to work well in both bass reflex and sealed when I plug in ports. To compensate for the decrease in size in bass reflex mode, I can try tuning the port at 50-53Hz. 40hz tune to me seems crazy, the group delay is very high.
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sacramento
|
Quote:
Hello,The Madisound bass-reflex recommendation tuned to 53 Hz is 12 L. I was thinking more of a cap (rather than a plug) with 2 to 4, ¼-20 cap screws with a T-nut like this pressed in the inside of the box. T Nuts, Insert Nuts, Propell Nuts, Weld Nuts DT All just for fun! |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
|
It´s a good idea too. Tomorrow i´ll start with the enclosures. Thanks for the tips
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lyon
|
An alternative could be an aperiodic box
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
i hope that maybe this is of some help
__________________
It still amazes me every time I get something right Last edited by mondogenerator; 27th December 2010 at 04:53 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
Tuning it wrong for the wrong reasons IMO is not a good idea at all. The tuning is perfectly sensible to me. The group delay is inevitable and FWIW superior to the higher tuning interpreted correctly, as are the other parameters except for maximum F3 bass extension. rgds, sreten. This driver IMO does not suit sealed well for full range, no subs. Suggested alignment is quasi-first order rolloff for room matching.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow Last edited by sreten; 27th December 2010 at 05:18 PM. |
|
|
|
#20 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
|
Agreed with Mondo.
Sealed much better. |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Another Peerless 830875 Execution | swin1 | Multi-Way | 16 | 4th October 2010 04:19 AM |
| Peerless 830875 vs SEAS CA18RNX | cs | Multi-Way | 0 | 5th March 2008 11:51 AM |
| Peerless 830875 Nomex????? | Gavinator68 | Multi-Way | 2 | 8th November 2005 01:55 AM |
| Peerless CSX 10 inch in sealed box or TL? | ashok | Multi-Way | 12 | 23rd January 2004 10:24 PM |
| good sealed box size for a 10" Peerless XLS sub | peerless | Multi-Way | 1 | 1st August 2003 09:01 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |