|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
  |
|
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
25th November 2010, 11:17 AM
|
#1 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Nov 2003
|
ca18rly vs. ca18rnx in sealed box
hi,
i must use in a sealed box. i know that ca18rly is projected for selaed cabinet, but i would know if the ca18rnx is better seeng all t/s paramameters. i don't need of punch but only go down in frequency. thank in advance Last edited by ermes; 25th November 2010 at 11:21 AM. |
|
|
25th November 2010, 12:16 PM
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
With 18 litres you would vent the CA18RNX. Qts is too low for sealed. rgds, sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CA18RLY or SB17 ? | percy | Multi-Way | 8 | 28th September 2010 01:08 PM |
| 2way with CA18RNX or ER18RNX | kaiser38 | Multi-Way | 46 | 15th August 2008 08:30 PM |
| CA18RNX Bookshelf help | benthe8track | Full Range | 4 | 17th February 2008 10:17 PM |
| seas ca18rnx | patrickfreen | Multi-Way | 0 | 7th June 2004 04:24 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.06160 seconds (67.02% PHP - 32.98% MySQL) with 10 queries |
