|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Audio Junkie
diyAudio Member
|
I am looking for some clarifications of the components used in this crossover circuit. this all seems pretty simple and straight forward. but I am curious about part interaction and part selection based on those interactions. let me see if i can explain this.
I paid Madisound to design a crossover using there LEAP system. However. due to size restrictions i cannot use the midrange i was going to use. therefore i am trying to reverse engineer this a bit and see if the High pass section can be saved and reused. Some basics. the tweeter is 4 ohm and the original midrange was 6 ohms. So looking at the schematic the 4.7uf and .12mh coil form a basic 12db HP filter. and i think the tweeter is crossing around 6khz or at least that's where the roll off starts on the graph. I would assume that the 3.3 and 33ohm resistors form a voltage divider to attenuate the tweeter a bit. but i am not sure about the function of the 2.2ohm other then to add some additional attenuation.... or maybe the 3.3 in series with the tweeter is to change the DC resistance/impedance. the tweeter is listed as having a DCR of 3.1 and putting 33 ohms in parallel with that we get about 2.83 ohms. so adding the 3.3 resistor we get 6.13 ohms... hmmmm Looking at any of the various crossover calcs online i don't get values anywhere near 4.7uf and .12 based on a 4 ohm calc. So I want to figure out what the resistors are doing and how they affect the circuit. So X-over experts what can you tell me.
__________________
It's not about what you can BUY...It's about what you can BUILD! Last edited by Zero Cool; 7th November 2010 at 01:39 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sydney
|
that's a simple 2nd order xover with l-pad, the 2.2 + 3.3 ohm resistors together make up the series resistor of the l-pad; they're split so that the 2.2 ohms resistor can be tweaked without affecting the frequency response of the filter.
When calculating xover parts values, you can't use the 'nominal' impedance of the driver or Re, you need to look at an impedance curve and use the actual value of impedance at the crossover frequency. Passive Crossover Network Design
__________________
‘today… there lives alongside the twentieth century the tenth or thirteenth. A hundred million people use electricity and still believe in the magic power of signs and exorcisms” Trotsky |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
|
A filter made with software will typically be optimized to meet a target function and usually won't give values similar to textbook equations. I suppose you could ask Madisound what target function/frequency they used.
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan Science is a way of thinking much more than it is a body of knowledge. --Carl Sagan |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Help needed understanding component values. | cbj591 | Tubes / Valves | 15 | 5th August 2010 09:23 PM |
| Differences between HP 8903A and HP 8903B | cl84 | Equipment & Tools | 2 | 16th June 2010 07:34 PM |
| are all functions patterns? | Chris8sirhC | Everything Else | 25 | 22nd March 2009 06:09 AM |
| DCX2496 EQ functions | compact7 | Subwoofers | 0 | 31st May 2006 01:18 PM |
| Transfer functions? | oracel | Multi-Way | 15 | 23rd October 2004 01:34 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.06728 seconds (76.57% PHP - 23.43% MySQL) with 11 queries |