Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 7th November 2010, 09:59 AM   #1
ruferto is offline ruferto  Portugal
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Default 2.1 system crossover

Hello,

I am tring to make a 2.1 system, and i was thinking of an passive crossover for the speakers and an active crossover for subwoofer.
Can i just put 1 cap (1st order) in serie with the main speakers, or is it better to make the coils for the (2nd order).
The coil, can it be done with 24 awg wire?
Waht is the influence of the DC resistence of the coil in the filter?


Sorry for the few questions,
R
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th November 2010, 10:51 AM   #2
ruferto is offline ruferto  Portugal
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Some passive sub pics.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1.JPG (67.5 KB, 162 views)
File Type: jpg 2.JPG (48.7 KB, 153 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th November 2010, 11:45 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Inductor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cascais
It's good to know the main drivers.
It can be decided later, depending of the design/prototype, what is better a 1/2.order.
If you need any help, please ask.
Quote:
Waht is the influence of the DC resistence of the coil in the filter?
Sometimes is better to have low DCR for a better freq. output and LF (low frequency) output.
There are other times that you need a resistor for padding that is like adding more resistance (in series).

Last edited by Inductor; 7th November 2010 at 11:55 PM. Reason: dcr
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th November 2010, 12:39 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
BobEllis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Upstate NY
A major concern should be the impedance of the mains over frequency. If un-compensated the resonant peak(s) due to the box (and port) could give you significantly different response than you expect. For an example, see Zaph's B3S article. Notice the high value components required to flatten the impedance.

You'll also need large value caps (and inductors if you go higher order.) You want to match the acoustic slopes of your main rolloff including crossover to that of the sub's low pass. Shallow roll off on the sub makes it easier to localize. Not much of an issue if it is centered between the mains, but otherwise, I suggest no less than 2nd order up to 60 Hz, or if you want to go higher, go 4th order.

Since you're making an active crossover for the sub, why not make both low pass and high pass active?
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th November 2010, 12:42 AM   #5
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 4
A 1st pass solution is to put the satelittes in an appropriately sized sealed box and use its natural 2nd order HP as the filter. Then if you need morw add a cap at the amplifier input.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th November 2010, 08:51 AM   #6
ruferto is offline ruferto  Portugal
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
The main speakers that i have are - Totem arro - and i want to take off the bass/subbass from them.

internet site
"Looking at the impedance/phase measurements, we see well controlled values that bottom in the mid bass at 4 ohms and rise to 22 ohms just below in frequency. "

Click the image to open in full size.

"Since you're making an active crossover for the sub, why not make both low pass and high pass active? "

I am afraid to mess up the signal with the OP-AMP.
I tried the cap. and it worked, but can it be better ??

ahhhhhhhh.... the subwoofer is an peerless XLS10 (830452) in a sealed box.

best regards,
R
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th November 2010, 12:49 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Inductor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cascais
Quote:
Originally Posted by ruferto View Post
I tried the cap. and it worked, but can it be better ??
What cap do you have? I would point to a xover at about 150Hz (or other 100Hz?). The best thing should be a in-line xover so to not affect the main speakers/xover frequency.
FMOD Crossover Pair 150 Hz High Pass | Parts-Express.com
And maybe closing/adjusting the back outputs/vents/transmission, after you have the Sub working.

Last edited by Inductor; 8th November 2010 at 12:55 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th November 2010, 12:54 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
BobEllis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Upstate NY
If you like the way it sounds, stick with it.

However, if you measure the response with the cap, you'll see that it doesn't roll off the way that you think. The idea of the cap is to have a voltage divider so that the cap's impedance is equal to the speakers' at say 80 Hz. If you sized the cap based on 8 ohms nominal impedance, the formula gives you 8 ohms impedance while your speaker has an impedance of nearly 20 ohms, so you won't get as much attenuation as you thought. Same at the port tuning frequency around 37 Hz. You'll have more attenuation than planned at 50 Hz and 150 Hz as your main impedance dips.

It's not as simple as just looking at the impedance magnitude, you need to the phase of the impedance in your calculations, but you get the idea.

If you don't like op amps, you can make a crossover with a jfet, bipolar or mosfet buffer or even a tube, as well as go completely passive, but passive requires more drive and you must incorporate the amplifier's input impedance in your calculations.

Personally, I don't find anything wrong with opamps (I use a lot of OPA2134), but of course you may not like them. Linkwitz' Orions use a load of OPA2134a in the crossover and get rave reviews. There are other opamp choices that some find better, I haven't tried any of the real high speed amps.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th November 2010, 07:37 PM   #9
ruferto is offline ruferto  Portugal
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
thanks for the replys,

I see that I was putting the cart before the donkey.
I will first finish the subwoofer and then do the part of the filter to the main speakers.
And main speakers I'll try the OP-AMP filter.

R
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th November 2010, 07:59 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
BobEllis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Upstate NY
Enjoy your project. There are a lot of us ready if you need help.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Crossover design for 2-way 3 driver system flyingfinngt Multi-Way 4 1st September 2010 05:44 AM
Crossover system for sub mid tweeters? captainlee Subwoofers 3 4th March 2010 05:40 PM
I am needing some passive crossover to use with my dual amplification system destroyer X Multi-Way 11 20th September 2009 02:34 PM
Sub Crossover for dual use system (Hi-Fi, HT) haldor Everything Else 2 25th February 2002 01:14 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:01 AM.

Page generated in 0.10547 seconds (82.71% PHP - 17.29% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio