|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bangalore, India
|
Hi,
Many surround speakers use dipoles where the listener is placed in the null area. With the typical 4"-6" size of the bass drivers used in them, there cannot be enough bass even on-axis. Do they really produce bass till 80Hz (-3db)? What is the real -3db point? Thanks, Goldy
__________________
Audio enthusiast/hobbyist |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
The idea is to generate a sound field around you ('surround') and a direct radiating speaker just to the left and right of the listening position is sometimes too directional. The dipole speaker will generate a sound pattern that avoids this and the output will bounce of other surfaces to increase the 'surround' effect.
__________________
"The test of the machine is the satisfaction it gives you. There isn't any other test. If the machine produces tranquility it's right. If it disturbs you it's wrong until either the machine or your mind is changed." Robert M Pirsig. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
The dipole as a surround is an artifact of the original (poor) dolby surround scheme. There is absolutely no reason to use them at all these days.
Toole has a good analysis of this. In short -- just forget that dipole surrounds ever existed. dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
In my limited experience, (ie, dipole surrounds vs bipole vs monopole), I found the dipole ones had a more immersive surround, with decent positioning between the speakers - tested with the Dark Knight, one of the iMAX scenes where a machine gun shoots a metal panel and it sounds like it pans behind you. Used a pair of 2.5" Sony widebands.
I suppose, in the end, a lot will depend on room placement. These were up against the same wall as the sofa, yet still managed to steer the effects behind you, regardless of listening position. To me, that's an ideal surround speaker. In free(er) space, I don't know if they'd do so well. Dipole surrounds usually have one bass driver and two tweeters (or two mid-high drivers). The lower frequencies would be monopole, the higher ones would be dipole. In this case, bass to 80Hz can be expected. Chris
__________________
"Throwing parts at a failure is like throwing sponges at a rainstorm." - Enzo My setup: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi...tang-band.html
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| any DIY dipole surround plans? | Pete_P | Multi-Way | 6 | 1st November 2009 11:54 AM |
| Dipole Surround | bjackson | Multi-Way | 0 | 12th December 2004 03:39 PM |
| dipole surround XO design -Visaton | John Allen | Multi-Way | 1 | 6th August 2004 08:07 PM |
| Dipole Surround Speaker Design | standingwave26 | Multi-Way | 9 | 2nd June 2004 04:05 AM |
| bass content in surround speakers | paulspencer | Multi-Way | 21 | 24th February 2004 12:26 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |