|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NZ
|
i know Isobarik is hardly worth it,after reading winisds old help files,and also diysubwoofers , etc..
heres the response, they are cheapies for sure,and only work in ported box isobarik,sealed box single woofer is pretty crap. 1 -how small must the enclosure between the 2 woofers be?? obviously the bigger,the more volume it takes up,of the box total. 2 which is better-clamshell,or tunnel the sealed box resonates really high obviously,the Fs is 45hz :P not very useful. he can power one channel onto each speaker. (of an amazing 'reactor car audio amp' which is probably 60watt rms clean,not 300 like it says lol.(its too cheap) Thanks!!green ported isobarik.yellow sealed. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Besides the non-tangible benefits that not many talk about, the biggest advantage of an isobarik is that it halves the Vas, which means for the same bass response you can have a cab 1/2 as big (+ coupling chamber).
With clamshell you have the benefit of the smallest possible coupling enclosure (good), but have to live with the noise from the back of the driver. If the driver is non-vented & you are only using them for low frequancies, it shouldn't be too much of an issue. dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Cranston, RI
|
1)The smaller the "enclosure" between the drivers the better.
2) Clamshell- see above I'm currently using a pair of 12's in a clamshell ported configuration for my HT sub. I modeled it with winISD and am very happy with the results. Not the best for music though, F3 @22hz. If box size is no object then the benefit of clamshell configuration becomes less important, but it is still easier to construct. In my case it helped me get two 12's into a 2.5 cubic ft ported box. I simply mounted one driver to the baffle as usual, then screwed down the other on top of it, face first. This left close to 3/4" between surrounds, separated by the pressed paper trim ring present on all JL Audio woofers. This is well beyond the normal excusion range for my use. I then sealed the two woofers together with black electrical tape. |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NZ
|
Quote:
it will be used for 70hz and under,i dont know if the driver is ported,do you mean pole peice vent/?its a real cheapie driver:P its gona make noise anyway i think they have a decent gasket on the front of the woofer,if so i can just mount them clamshell,easily,il ask my mate for a look at them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Cheapie Dai-1chi 8" FR driver in an isobarik box? | Brisso57 | Full Range | 9 | 13th April 2007 11:43 AM |
| WTB: A few good volume pots/cheapie attenuators. | Spasticteapot | Swap Meet | 0 | 30th November 2006 04:45 AM |
| Is this for real? Cheapie amp with Tripath chip | KT | Chip Amps | 11 | 28th May 2004 02:17 AM |
| Anybody knows where t oget cheapie self-adhesive copper tape?? | li_gangyi | Everything Else | 8 | 13th December 2003 04:57 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09935 seconds (67.33% PHP - 32.67% MySQL) with 11 queries |