Ground Plane BBT Array - Thinking aloud - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 30th October 2010, 07:10 AM   #1
jamikl is offline jamikl  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Melbourne
Default Ground Plane BBT Array - Thinking aloud

I have been reading some of the literature available on these
arrays, especially Don Keele Jr's papers.

What I am wondering is do you really need all those little tweeters
alongside the mid - upper base speakers. If using the ground plane
of appropriate height for your listening room and seating area could
the highs be handled by a distance aligned CD waveguide mounted
at an appropriate height able the ground plane unit or even suspended
from the wall or ceiling and angled to cover the listening area the waveguide
should be above the upper angle of the main speaker. Would this only
work, if at all, in one specific seating position or could it give broader coverage to the room.

I also wondered about suspending a full curved CBT, with the highs only,
above the ground plane CBT. Acting much like the waveguide. I don't mind cutting all the holes necessary to cover up to 1500HZ - 3KHz ( 6" or 3-4"
speakers) but not all those tiny tweeter holes.

Feel free to comment either way.
jamikl
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th October 2010, 07:31 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
I think your idea is valid. Even if the match in
vertical coverage might not be perfect at crossover,
also the horizontal plane is the one to optimize for.

With a well designed array - possibly using a WG for the
highs - you will have a more uniform result in the whole
room than with a conventional 2-way.

Even a reduced length tweeter array - positioned at
appropriate height - is a way to go.


With the WG i see some problems, not only with radiation
pattern matching but also with group delay, if you want the
WG mouth and midrangers to radiate from the same plane.

Kind Regards
__________________
Oliver, RFZ believer (?)
www.dipol-audio.de

Last edited by LineArray; 30th October 2010 at 07:35 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th October 2010, 08:36 AM   #3
jamikl is offline jamikl  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Melbourne
Thanks for the input LineArray. I've realised since posting that the tweeters are so small the mounting holes can probably be made with a spade drill.
I still like the idea of the horn or separate panel for the highs as it just
does not look right unless the units are all vertically mounted IE above each other - mid - tweeter. There may be no good reason for me feeling this way I suppose. Certainly if Mr. Keele does it who am I to feel it is not right!!!
jamikl
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th October 2010, 09:21 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
HF waveguide ontop of the bass-midrange line array,
or reduced length tweeter array ontop is not a good idea.

But two close lines in parallel having the tweeter's
line array shorter and at appropriate listening height is
an approach that is frequently chosen.

Of course with "constant vertical beamwith" taken
seriously, lines of different length may not 100% conform.

In my opinion conformity to the constant beamwith
approach even for large vertical angles has it's main
purpose for public adress ...

In a living room i would assume slightly different
criteria due to dispersion.

Kind Regards
__________________
Oliver, RFZ believer (?)
www.dipol-audio.de
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st November 2010, 05:55 AM   #5
jamikl is offline jamikl  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Melbourne
Default CBT + Waveguide

Thanks for your thoughts LineArray I have used the spreadsheets for
line arrays that have been around for few years now. I don't know
enough of the maths to do my own. I modeled 20 x 3" cone dia.
drivers with a gap between them to allow for surround/frames. I
also modeled 20 X 0.5", 0.75" and 1" tweeters. All models were
done with power tapering over the last 3-4 speakers each side of centre.
The 3" looked good up to 2800 - 3000Hz. All the tweeters looked like a
pencil point. Reasonably broad at low end but coming almost to a sharp
point at 20KHZ. I can't hear this anyway as I am 64.

It looked from that as though a 60/40 guide would be a better match if it
could be fitted in. I know that the tweeter array I modeled was quite
short but it did not look good. The spreadsheet models with the centre of
the array at listening height
jamikl
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
star ground vs. ground plane Sebastiaan Chip Amps 15 10th May 2009 05:05 PM
Ideas for ground plane/shielding? hotbottle Tubes / Valves 7 25th March 2008 12:41 PM
Using Ground Plane on Both sides of Board? ppl Solid State 11 13th October 2006 04:14 PM
ground plane interference with output mazurek Solid State 0 17th August 2006 10:14 PM
I discovered CDP ground plane. What should I do with it? DIAR Digital Source 18 4th December 2004 12:29 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:58 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2