|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bucharest
|
Hi folks,
What would be the radiation pattern of a "widget dipole" as depicted in my sketch and which woulld be it's axis of symmetry? What I need: I have an existing "Y" or "A" frame with a woofer. I want to augment it with a second woofe on one of the wings for 2 reasons: - get more bass (admittedly, probably it will not double because of how the outputs of the 2 woofers in the frame would combine) - get an additional bass source whose direction of radiation is different than the first, to make the response more uniform in my current room. I expect a sort of cardioid. Perhaps having the 2 woofers at 90 degrees rather than >90 degrees would be better? What do you think ?
__________________
I don't believe in audio believings. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bucharest
|
Nobody tried a folded baffle like this ?
I know of the RAAL Eternitư, which uses woofers on 5 sides of a cube, the 6th being open - but that's a symmetrical arrangement and should give you a sort of dipole radiation that is horrizontally symmetrical (but the front lobe should wider) Any software you know that can simulate this ?
__________________
I don't believe in audio believings. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
Hello,
i expect the radiation axis to be oriented diagonally from upper left to lower right in the picture. It will be a cardioid. Cardioid shape will probably be more pronounced towards upper bass. Concerning "uniformity" in the room, please note that typically below 200Hz in most rooms sound pressure at a certain listening position depends on excitation of room modes. To get higher efficiency a larger dipole path length would be the way to go ... Kind Regards |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bucharest
|
Thanks LineArray!
Quote:
It is precisely because the current 1-woofer dipole causes a deep suckout on a mode around 70 Hz that I wanted to "fill in" - kind of the Geddes multiple subs approach, but with dipoles. But I realize that I need separate dipoles for that:it was a bit naive to consider the 2 woofers in a folded baffle as independent dipoles. The widget configuration might or might not be better, depending on how it fits the modes.
__________________
I don't believe in audio believings. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: US
|
Quote:
More likely [no, for sure] it will be dipole at low frequency and who knows what it would morph into as the frequency rises.
__________________
John k.... Music and Design NaO Dipole Loudspeakers. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dipole Ribbon tweeter isolation from dipole mid-woofer array | Bent | Planars & Exotics | 5 | 21st May 2009 12:10 PM |
| (WW) MMTMM dipole – 4 vs 3 way / dipole benefit frequencies? | charliemouse | Multi-Way | 25 | 7th July 2007 11:19 PM |
| Puresound widget? | raintalk | Multi-Way | 1 | 14th December 2005 01:03 AM |
| When is a dipole not a dipole anymore? | Bas Horneman | Multi-Way | 5 | 5th December 2003 03:02 PM |
| dipole....or not... | navin | Multi-Way | 79 | 28th July 2003 11:39 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08120 seconds (76.85% PHP - 23.15% MySQL) with 11 queries |