|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: London
|
Hi. I have a pair of the original Musical Fidelity MC4's. I am thinking of replacing the metal dome tweeter with the Morel Supreme https://www.wilmslow-audio.co.uk/cat...5rkiogeedgt903
Does this sound like a worthwhile project? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cascais
|
Interesting and expensive...
Do you change the xover? http://www.morelhifi.com/products/pd...t%20ST1048.pdf http://www.clofis.nl/nl/seas/H0414%2019TAFG.PDF Faceplate and inside diameters are different. The res.freq is high for the SEAS. 1700Hz. What might not matter with/if a very high xover freq. on the Musical Fidelity MC4. Better with the Morel Fs=680Hz. If you can afford the money on those old speakers (?) I would go forward.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: London
|
Hi Inductor and thanks for the reply.
It will be very useful to have the specs of the MC4 tweeter. I know nothing about the technical aspects of what I intend but have a very knowledgable friend if I run into problems. I have been speaking to Neil at Wilmslow Audio and he is very helpful too. I am hoping to use the existing cross over. I am a woodworker so adapting the baffle to acept a diferent tweeter should not be too dificult. A better question to ask the forum may have been " Is changing the tweeter on a well designed commercially produced 'speaker likely to result in improvement?" |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Very hit and miss project unless you plan to remeasure the drivers and redesign the crossover.
Try finding a tweeter with near identical specs (frequency response and impedance curve) for a straight swap. Check out the Vifa and Seas line. No need to spend more than 50 pounds per driver. Also think about upgrading the crossover components while you're at it. Last edited by David Gatti; 15th October 2010 at 11:25 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: London
|
Hmmm. Looks like I am going about this the wrong way. Maybe I should be looking for someone knowledgeable on here to reccomend me a tweeter and build me a crossover. Any suggestions? Thanks for the help so far. You have saved me from an expensive mistake.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Midlands
|
Kris, go to: HIFICRITIC, audio review magazine, hi fi critic - and join-up,
then start a titled "Musical Fidelity MC4" thread there in the Forum's DIY HiFi section - its designer might reply !
__________________
Alan Last edited by alan-1-b; 16th October 2010 at 07:30 PM. Reason: to add a few words |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: London
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cascais
|
Quote:
![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: London
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: South East England
|
If it's the original MC-4 with the rectangular Elac metal dome tweeter I doubt there was any significant response shaping going on in the crossover. I must've had about the first of these in amateur hands for a DIY design. Assume about 90dB/ Watt for the driver, although the overall system sensitivity may have been lower. I should think the nearest thing would be the SEAS 27TBFCG, even down to the slight roll off at the top end. The Elac was the usual nominal 6 Ohm impedance, IIRC, and had a back chamber like the SEAS, so the fs and corresponding impedance peak should be out of the way of the crossover frequency. It might well just drop in acoustically and electrically- but sadly not physically! If the tweeters are still working and you are looking for an improvement, the Elacs still sound pretty good by modern standards, but there's lots of choice for alternatives apart from the Morels, many of them cheaper and arguably as good or better. You may just get different rather than better though, in the context of the MC-4. On balance I'd probably stick with the Elacs until they break...
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Morel Supreme 110s and Scanspeak 18w8531G00s | David Gatti | Swap Meet | 1 | 1st July 2007 12:07 AM |
| Morel Supreme 110 x MDT-33 | wmj | Multi-Way | 5 | 17th November 2006 12:06 PM |
| Morel Supreme 110 Tweeters For Sale | mp006ltk | Swap Meet | 8 | 10th October 2006 12:53 AM |
| Revelators vs Morel Supreme 110 | 6BX7GT | Multi-Way | 0 | 28th March 2006 02:59 AM |
| morel supreme of supremo? | caz | Multi-Way | 5 | 10th May 2004 10:44 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12689 seconds (73.91% PHP - 26.09% MySQL) with 11 queries |