|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: England
|
I need one for each of my 2 way moniters, with a flat sweep the bass is considerably lower volume so I have to have the bass turned up on my preamp which I don't like. The problem is I have no idea to how much I need to 'quieten' the tweeter to meet the woofers volume. Both drivers are a 8 ohm and are crossed at 3KHz.
Thanks Boscoe |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Swindon
|
Padding the tweeter won't have the same effect as the bass lift control on your pre-amp. The control on your pre-amp probably boosts around the 100Hz and under range, if you pad the tweeter you'll effectively boost 3kHz and under, it will effect a lot more than just the bass end! Why do you dislike using the tone control if it does what you want it to?
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: England
|
It's not vital but I like the speakers to have a flat response then change the the tone control. Don't know really just how I want them!!
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Open up the speaker and tell us what's in the crossover.
Best approach will be to increase the resistor value in series with the tweeter. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Banned
|
I'd take aboard what has already been said, but for future reference, just google 'speaker attenuator calculator'.
L-Pad (Driver Attenuation Circuit) Designer / Calculator w |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: England
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
OK, that 2.5 ohm/12 ohm resistor combination is giving about 3.5dB attenuation to the tweeter..
I suggest you reduce the 12 ohm resistor to 8 ohms and increase the 2.5 ohm resistor to 3.5 ohms. That will give about 5.5 dB attenuation (i.e. an extra 2 dB), without altering the 3kHz crossover point. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
Just a few questions:
is it a commercial speaker or a diy one? the 300-500 Hz region is also lower volume than the treble? In my limited experience I would say that there isn't a correct BSC. Ralf |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: England
|
It's a diy build. I don't know what BSC is?
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
BSC = Baffle Step Conpensation
For an explanation of the baffle step effect see (for example): Baffle Diffraction Step Here you can find a useful (an free) software that can simulate the effect: Baffle Diffraction Simulator The compensation of the effect is done primarily with the main woofer inductor, for you that means you have to rework the entire crossover. Ralf |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Looking for digital attenuator design..... | Mark A. Gulbrandsen | Pass Labs | 3 | 8th June 2011 01:43 PM |
| I ned a 6ch digitally-controlled attenuator. Anyone know of a design? | Spasticteapot | Digital Line Level | 2 | 27th February 2009 08:17 PM |
| Alternate 32 step attenuator design | neutron7 | Chip Amps | 2 | 19th March 2004 03:24 PM |
| passive attenuator design | lbenoit | Solid State | 3 | 1st March 2004 10:51 AM |
| (LONG!)Crossover Design - 2nd Order Butterworth with attenuator | GeniX | Multi-Way | 2 | 22nd October 2002 11:03 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09605 seconds (77.27% PHP - 22.73% MySQL) with 10 queries |