|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I only have one method of port calculation, so I was wondering, given the specs, if someone out there could run the numbers to see if the answer is the same ?
thanks in advance for any help. Net Volume Box = 3.0 cubic foot Desired Port freq. ( Fb ) = 50 Hz Using 2x 4" i.d. ports my answer: length of vent = 5.0 inches |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
Except for some early T/S math which calcs a ~6.09" long vent (no flares), all others I have say a 5" length will be 47-48 Hz, so ~4.1" seems the most correct length, but all these assume that the cab's air mass has a ~uniform particle density, so if it's a high aspect ratio cab, then even the shorter one could be too long.
GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
I get 4.88 inches so I would say you will be OK at 5 as at least you have some spare to trim if necessary. Tuning seems dangerously high for such a big box, what are you building?
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Since this is my most favourite forum, I thought I'd give as much info as possible. This (pair) of enclosures is the upper bass/low mid section of a full-scale assault-type of sysytem. The designated range is from 60-250Hz. Each enclosure will house 2) 12" pro-type woofers model Eminence HO4012. There is a woofer on the front and exactly opposite it, on the back, in a reaction cancelling arrangement. Originally, the plan called for each driver in it's own encloure of 1.5 ft^3 w/ 2x4" vents, but this required vents much too long to fit inside a reasonable enclosure. A lightbulb in my head finally lit up, and I decided a common volume of 3 cubic feet, and just one pair of 4" vents for the entire volume. The measured woofer specs are Fs 46; Qts .35 Vas 2.4 I think i'll opt to place the vents on the rear, as I really don't want to look at them. The crossover slopes are 24/db/ oct high-pass and 48 db/ oct low-pass. Since the high pass is 60, and the vents are tuned to 50, I am not so concerned with vent compression, if even I need be ? All comments and criticisms welcome. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
Seems OK but you will have more port noise, as you have halved the port area. Whether this is audible or not is another question, I suspect you will be OK as you are filtering higher than the port frequency. Give it a go and see
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Quick bass reflex port question... | revans | Everything Else | 26 | 8th March 2009 06:36 PM |
| Quick Port Question | ReTrO | Subwoofers | 13 | 10th May 2008 02:31 PM |
| Single Port Vent Better than Dual Port? | Daveis | Multi-Way | 18 | 15th July 2007 05:12 AM |
| To port or not to port? Newbie with newly built mains | starquake | Multi-Way | 1 | 18th December 2004 12:51 PM |
| Quick question about port placement | owdi | Multi-Way | 9 | 1st October 2004 05:38 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07515 seconds (74.10% PHP - 25.90% MySQL) with 10 queries |