|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: London
|
I was thinking of a 7" 2-way build, but I think I should look at MTM before committing.
I already have a pair of Monacor SPH 130AL which are aluminium cone, SD80 fs48hz, Qts .32, vas 11L. They are 8 ohms so could be paralleled to give 4 ohms with a 4 ohm tweeter. Sensitivity is 88db. How good would such a speaker sound? If this is a good idea please mention some other 5" or 6" bass-mids that sound good in existing designs I might consider. I'd be hoping to drive the speakers with a 300b SET so 8 to 10 watts. andy |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
Using 6" drivers in a MTM configurations will benefit from the higher sensitivity. Do you any ideia of which tweeter you will use? To take full advantage of the MTM configuration the tweeter needs to have 91 dB of efficiency, and must be able to cross low. Is the amp able to deal with a low impedance? I think it is, but is better to check first.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: London
|
I was thinking of the SB-Acoustics SB29RDC. This has a sensitivity quoted as 93db and can be crossed over at 1.5K as I read it. I'm guessing the lower you can cross over with MTM the less problems you have with integrating two mid-bass speakers.
A tube amp has an output transformer, so I would make sure this was wired for 4 ohms out. Thanks for any more suggestions! andy |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: London
|
I found this unit which is somewhat similar to the Monacor in size and cone material.
http://www.zaphaudio.com/ZA14W08/ZA14W08-datasheet.pdf Here it is used in designs including MTM Zaph|Audio - ZA5 Speaker Designs with ZA14W08 woofer and Vifa DQ25SC16-04 tweeter andy |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
Down worry about the tweeter sensitivity. If you do a proper Baffle Step Compensation if your x-over, you wont get more than 87 dB sensitivity from the two midwoofers. With that sensitivity figure, an 8W amp dont seem like a good option to me. If you want good efficiency use some light-weight paper-cone drivers rather than heavy aluminium.
__________________
dipoles dipoles dipoles dipoles dipoles dipoles dipoles dipoles and dipoles |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: London
|
I have to say that I have no experience of designing crossovers. I have the components because I build my own amps, I just don't have any speaker software to calculate stuff with, plus I use a Mac so any software has to work on that. Consequently I know nothing about baffle step compensation, which clearly I should, especially with MTM arrangements.
Actually Zaph shows two designs for the ZA5 Zaph|Audio - ZA5 Speaker Designs with ZA14W08 woofer and Vifa DQ25SC16-04 tweeter One is a MTM and the other is a 2.5 way with tweeter at the top. Which of these designs is better? andy |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "Suppressed Mids" and tweeter / woofer phase? | samtny | Multi-Way | 28 | 26th February 2008 08:41 PM |
| design help needed: monopole 15" / 8" MTM open baffle with Manger | taloyd | Multi-Way | 26 | 26th January 2007 10:53 PM |
| 6.5" vs 5.25" in MTM | augerpro | Multi-Way | 24 | 22nd November 2006 08:13 AM |
| Which mids and tweeters have the "velvety" signature to them? | sqlkev | Multi-Way | 6 | 23rd February 2006 07:51 PM |
| 10" basS/mid for "party-speaker" | TroelsM | Multi-Way | 0 | 16th September 2005 11:14 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08013 seconds (76.40% PHP - 23.60% MySQL) with 10 queries |