|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: London
|
I know this one has been rumbling around for ages but the last posts I can find are some years ago now and although I think series seems to be the generally accepted fave..................
Opinions please. 2 x "identical" woofers for a single centre channel, 8 ohms nominal each and a sensitivitly of 85.5dB (2.83V/1m). In series, therefore, 16 ohm, 4 ohm in parallel. The separate mono amp to drive these quotes (RMS) 190W into 8 ohms, 300W into 4 Ohm and also 300W into 2 Ohm. So it would appear it should be able to "happily" drive these units in parallel. On paper, correct me if I'm wrong, (be gentle, novice here!), I would prefer them in parallel due to their relatively low sensitivity compared to the single midrange to be used which has a quoted sensitivity quoted of 91dB. So, in parallel the combined woofer output would be relatively greater, therefore requiring less "correction" in the XO due to the sensitivity difference?? The less "correction" required in the XO the better IMHO. I would be grateful for and comments and any other factors to consider. Thanks. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
You'll be somewhere near. Due to the Fletcher-Munson curve, you might need to pad the mid down a little, but this will be dependant on personal tastes and listening volume, so don't worry about it too much. Just be prepared to tweak if it's not quite there.
When drivers wired in parallel are given the same voltage as before, you get a 6dB increase in level. The current for a set voltage doubles as there's half the impedance, and the radiating area doubles, each of which gives +3dB. You'd end up with around 91dB at 2.83 volts through the lows and mids, so, as I said above, you'll be somewhere near. Chris
__________________
"Throwing parts at a failure is like throwing sponges at a rainstorm." - Enzo My setup: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi...tang-band.html
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: London
|
Thanks very much. Sounds good, hope so anyway!
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
What woofers are they?
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: London
|
Hi
Midwoofers really, space being somewhat limited. 2 x Scanspeak 15W/8531K00 5.25" in a nominal 15.6L enclosure. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
Yes, looking at the FR curves of your woofs, you will likely need to pad the mids a bit.
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hamburg
|
Another problem when going serial is the slighty different impedance response of the woofers around their resonance frequency. Voltage drop will be different, thus will be the SPL of the woofers.
For example, one woofer has its resonance frequency at 50 Hz, the other one at 45 Hz (10% tolerance, that's realistic). So one woofer will get much more power at 45 Hz, as his impedance is much lower at this point than the impedance of the other woofer, and the other way round. I would always connect woofers in parallel to avoid this problem. A pack of two parallel woofers can then be connected with another pair of parallel woofers as the tolerances should be less this way. Midranges and tweeters that are not used at their resonance frequency can be connected in serial, if thats necessary. Bye, Spatz |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: London
|
Many thanks to you all.
I feel much more confident progressing this project now. |
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
|
Quote:
Speakers are and should be more or less flat. Sound shaping should be left to the artist, audio engineers (recording/mix/master) and architects.. ;-) /Peter |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
You have a point, though I did mention that it would be down to personal taste/preference.
That said, equal loudness curves are also volume dependant (which is why the old loudness button is still going strong), so this will also be a factor to consider when setting the levels. Chris
__________________
"Throwing parts at a failure is like throwing sponges at a rainstorm." - Enzo My setup: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi...tang-band.html
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Series-Parallel Or Parallel-Series | shaan | Full Range | 43 | 13th December 2009 04:10 AM |
| Three 10" 4Ohm subs, wired in series or series-parallel? | Nagamitsu | Car Audio | 24 | 10th May 2009 03:24 AM |
| series or parallel? | medicman | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 22nd January 2009 04:42 PM |
| Series vs parallel? | legendaryfrog | Full Range | 5 | 14th December 2006 02:50 PM |
| What would you do? series/parallel | MtnBob | Multi-Way | 13 | 14th April 2005 10:17 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |