BassBox PRO and F3 calculation on a 2x10" bass cab
 User Name Stay logged in? Password
 Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Search

 Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

 Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
 13th September 2010, 03:40 PM #1 washburn_it   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Tuscany, Italy BassBox PRO and F3 calculation on a 2x10" bass cab Hi, this is my first post here and I'm a beginner with building cabs even though I already built some cab with encouraging results. Before telling you my problem, I would like to explane what I want to do. Since I play the bass guitar, I would like to build a 2x10" bass cab (vented box) to use alone but also coupled with my 1x15" (600 Watt RMS @ 8 ohm) Parsek (now known as MarkBass) to extend the mid freq. response of the 1x15". The 2x10" cab will have a total impedance of 8 ohm that, coupled with the 1x15", give a resulting impedance of 4 ohm (my amp head is a 400 Watt RMS @ 4 ohm, it can't go down to 2 ohm). As designing software I'm using BassBox Pro 6 with the latest update and the speaker that I thought to use is the B&C 10NW64 (16 ohm version) connected in parallel (thus 8 ohm total impedance). I've chosen that speaker because it has a high XMax (if compared with other 10") and I play a 5 strings bass (that can go low to 30 Hz playing the Low B) but simulating the response of the cab (@ 400 Watt) I found some confusing result. Parameters of the calculated box are (rounded valuse): Vb=65 liters Fb=53 Hz QL=7 F3=54 Hz FIll=minimal No. of Vents=2 Dv= 100 mm (calculated pressing the "Suggest minimum vent area for XMax") Lv= 133 mm Box measures (external)= W 600, H 400, D 400 mm Wall Thickness= 18 mm Maximum Cone displacement 8 mm @ 38 Hz If I plot the "Normalize Amplitude Response" the F3 is not at 53 Hz as calculated by the program but around at 120 Hz ! And then all frequencies below 232 Hz are below to 0 dB ! So...a cab like this would be unusable for me. Why this difference between calculated F3 and the "plotted" F3? I would like to use this cab also as standalone (not coupled with the 1x15") when I have gigs into small pubs so it should have a good response around 30 to 2000 Hz (it will have a tweeter to extend the response up to 18/20 Khz). Is it something possible with a 2x10" to get close to an "audible" 30 Hz? Or this is just a dream... Regards, Roberto PS: sorry in advance for my english, I'm not english mother tongue. Last edited by washburn_it; 13th September 2010 at 03:55 PM. Reason: correction
dabbler
Account disabled at member's request

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Between cities!
WinISD says 60L cabinet tuned to 60hz gives F3 of around 55hz.

30hz is around 26db down..
Attached Images
 10NW64.JPG (98.8 KB, 159 views)

 14th September 2010, 08:40 AM #3 washburn_it   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Tuscany, Italy Uhm...who is right then? WinISD or BassBox Pro?
 14th September 2010, 09:33 AM #4 washburn_it   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Tuscany, Italy I've made other tests...I made a simulation with 4 vents (Dv=100 mm, Lv=312) obtaining a F3= 59 Hz with Fb= 63 Hz but still all frequencies between F3 and 200 Hz are below 0 dB. What can I do to "pull up" those values or, at least, reduce the range of freq. below 0 dB? Thank you, regards. Roberto
 14th September 2010, 08:24 PM #5 phase_accurate diyAudio Member   Join Date: May 2002 Location: Switzerland Maybe you could post a graph of the result. Maybe the problem is not as bad as you feel ! Regards Charles
 14th September 2010, 11:28 PM #6 washburn_it   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Tuscany, Italy I've made further simulations increasing the volume Vb (now it's 90 liters) so now Fb=60 Hz and F3=54,81 Hz. Graphs are the following: As you can see on the "Normalized Amplitude Response" graph all frequencies between F3 and 226 Hz are below 0 dB. Is that good? I didn't expect that kind of "saddle" (I hope that is the right term) starting from around 70 Hz to 226 Hz. How would you judge a box with such graphs?
bjorno
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Jacobsmountain
FYI,

IMO,If your TS are correct? Max ported box compliance volume should be ~40L or less and the port system preferably a slotted type.

b
Attached Images
 2xB&C-10NW64-16-ported-box.JPG (682.4 KB, 84 views)

 15th September 2010, 11:19 AM #8 washburn_it   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Tuscany, Italy Yes, TS parameters are correct, I copied them directly from the producer web site: B&C SPEAKERS . Could you explane me the meaning of all those graphs? Thank you, regards. Roberto
bjorno
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Jacobsmountain
Quote:
 Originally Posted by washburn_it Yes, TS parameters are correct, I copied them directly from the producer web site: B&C SPEAKERS ...
Hi Roberto,

I still cant find published 16 Ohm T/S data at the B&C web site, only for 8-Ohm drivers!

Quote:
 Could you explane me the meaning of all those graphs?
Answer: Hopefully to visualize better ported deigns using the B&C drivers,of course!
You have to put design questions if you want (a) specific answer(s).

I used the HR= Horn-resp program to simulate ported boxes with 3 different
port diameters/ lengths using a volume of 40 Liters I found to be a Rek. maximum for 2 drivers using your parameters as an input to the HR input screen:
..i.e. the drivers seen Qt in the box is about 0.43 for the drivers(~20L/driver) before completely unloading (and in-band sagging at low frequencies) that also can be calculated if the box have blocked port(s) (i.e. Qtc=0.43).

A driver seen Qt value below ~0.5 (>6.1L/driver) can be considered to extend the lower FR bound at the expense of power handling within the FR extension and the FR will not be flat but sloping if the port length is too long.

The layout screen shows the box system volume = port + the compliance volume(=40L) and that the different port volumes treated separated in the simulations, i.e. the total box internal volume is always the system volume.

The port to nearest driver C-C is chosen to be = 20 cm.

The SPL graphs shows the summed response and the driver contribution separated at an input power level where driver x-mech is not exceeded at 1 Hz.

Both the impedance and excursion plots shows ported boxes tuned below fs.

b

 15th September 2010, 02:04 PM #10 phase_accurate diyAudio Member   Join Date: May 2002 Location: Switzerland Are you sure you are actually displaying the amplitude response and not the max SPL ? Regards Charles

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Site     Site Announcements     Forum Problems Amplifiers     Solid State     Pass Labs     Tubes / Valves     Chip Amps     Class D     Power Supplies     Headphone Systems Source & Line     Analogue Source     Analog Line Level     Digital Source     Digital Line Level     PC Based Loudspeakers     Multi-Way     Full Range     Subwoofers     Planars & Exotics Live Sound     PA Systems     Instruments and Amps Design & Build     Parts     Equipment & Tools     Construction Tips     Software Tools General Interest     Car Audio     diyAudio.com Articles     Music     Everything Else Member Areas     Introductions     The Lounge     Clubs & Events     In Memoriam The Moving Image Commercial Sector     Swap Meet     Group Buys     The diyAudio Store     Vendor Forums         Vendor's Bazaar         Sonic Craft         Apex Jr         Audio Sector         Acoustic Fun         Chipamp         DIY HiFi Supply         Elekit         Elektor         Mains Cables R Us         Parts Connexion         Planet 10 hifi         Quanghao Audio Design         Siliconray Online Electronics Store         Tubelab     Manufacturers         AKSA         Audio Poutine         Musicaltech         Aussie Amplifiers         CSS         exaDevices         Feastrex         GedLee         Head 'n' HiFi - Walter         Heatsink USA         miniDSP         SITO Audio         Twin Audio         Twisted Pear         Wild Burro Audio

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Tom V Full Range 12 13th June 2010 11:52 AM smithy666 Subwoofers 4 2nd February 2007 12:54 AM konstantin Swap Meet 2 12th May 2005 12:47 PM zuki Subwoofers 12 15th February 2005 08:54 AM

 New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:55 AM.