|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
|
Just finished an OB design that incorpoartes some interesting concepts. I spent the weekend listening and I am favorably impressed.
Type: OB dipole up to approx 5.5k Hz. Biamped helper woofer, actively crossed and roll-off compensated. Coaxially mounted pro audio mid w/traditional 1" fabric dome tweeter. Acoustically dampened and isolated panels w/closed cell suspension. Visco-elastic feet. Helper Woofer: Peerless 10" Nomex XXLS woofer. 250Hz lowpass, 24dB/octave. Mid: Eminence Acoustinator 8" poly mid range, coax 1 1/8" 18TPI threaded, allowed to roll-off naturally. Tweeter: Morel MDT-20 mounted coaxially, 1.8mf single cap, 6dB per octave. Initial crossover points surprisingly good. Will spend some time tweaking. The drivers produce some respectable SPL's w/o strain. These were initially designed with many genres in mind. The acoustinator mid is a hair dark, but still makes for a realistic presentation. The voicing is very pleasing to me. More to come. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hello, I assume you use them for PC speakers? Great work !
How far do you place them from the rear wall?
__________________
http://gainphile.blogspot.com |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
|
Quote:
Interestingly I also tried them outdoors to listen w/o any boundary effect. They sound surprisingly full and warm, possibly due to the high excursion capabilities of the XXLS (13mm) and a higher than typical 250Hz lowpass filter. The XXLS remains clean much higher than that, but the 8" Emi is no slouch either, so a higher xo point is not desired. The low to upper mids are actually quite satisfying, which make them just as apt to reproduce electronic music... something I have found to be lacking in many dipole designs. This was a primary design goal for me... thus the title of the thread. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
Some details of the dome mounting please? Didn't think that was at all possible.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
|
Quote:
Selenium ADM25-25 Horn Adapter | Parts-Express.com It's easiest when the drivers flange diameter is 4" or greater. Align the tweeters center with the 1" throat and make a reference. I drill three holes through the horn adapter first, making sure they pass between the tweeter's outer flange diameter and body, away from the terminals. Then I clamp the tweeter back in position and use the adapter's pilot holes as a template, drilling straight therough the tweeter flange. Finish with flat head screws, locking washers and nuts, with the nuts facing outward. 10/32" screws work well. Acoustically, the tweeter's dome should wind up in the same relative position as the element of a HF horn driver on a similar mid. If matched correctly, the single point source geometry is quite effective, using the mid driver's cone geometry as a wave guide. Driver selection is key, and with the proper x/o dispersion and off axis response aren't bad at all. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
I just finished my first pair of OBs and from all the reading and talking I did, a wide baffle and having the driver off center is needed to ensure the lower freqs are not cancled. How does that work with such a small baffle on yours?
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
|
Quote:
Offsetting the driver speaks more to retaining a proper stereo image than cancellation. In my test baffle I tested on center, 1.5" and 2.5" off center. With my single point source combination there was almost no distinguishable difference. I actually have 3 front panels cut with varying driver offsets. They are interchangable and can be swapped by removing 4 bolts. Let me assure you that the quality and quantity of bass is not lacking. Unlike many dipoles I have heard, they excel in the 150Hz to 500Hz range; a solid presence w/o sounding boomy. In my opinion this is key to enjoying OB speakers with more modern music. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
That makes sense. I am new to OB and used the EDGE program to figure out my baffle size. I opted not to use the EQ the EDGE provides and went with big baffles. My wife and I are both artist and we are going to take one baffle board each and use them for canvases. Should be interesting. Here is a pic of my speakers. I'd never heard OBs before I built them and I am hooked.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New York
|
djn, i am looking forward to seeing the art from you and your wife on those speakers.
matevana... i drink you every once in a while and my kids enjoy your hint of chocolaty flavor. These two examples of open baffle speakers are a perfect example of how there are different ways to achieve similar goals. Zilla |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
|
Quote:
It is true that once you hear the 'correctness' of dipole bass, it's difficult to listen to monkey coffins.
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| M-dipoles | el`Ol | Multi-Way | 1 | 25th February 2010 09:12 AM |
| Dipoles ? | LennyK | Multi-Way | 111 | 21st September 2006 03:12 PM |
| 3-way or 4-way dipoles? | mazeroth | Multi-Way | 0 | 25th January 2006 06:37 AM |
| Not your grand-daddy's Edison cylinders | jackinnj | Instruments and Amps | 0 | 27th June 2005 02:04 AM |
| Quasi Dipoles | BassAwdyO | Subwoofers | 8 | 13th March 2005 07:04 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11744 seconds (83.16% PHP - 16.84% MySQL) with 11 queries |