diyAudio

diyAudio (http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/)
-   Multi-Way (http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi-way/)
-   -   Question about driver impedance data (http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi-way/172851-question-about-driver-impedance-data.html)

tipo1000 31st August 2010 06:20 PM

Question about driver impedance data
 
1 Attachment(s)
Hi,

There's up to 3dB difference in FR between two SEAS P18RNX/P drivers at about 800Hz region when measured in same cabinet.

I measured impedance for both drivers in free air. See the attachment. Is this kind of difference in impedance normal between drivers?

Thanks,
Timo

sreten 31st August 2010 07:04 PM

Hi,

For both drivers you have an impedance kink at around 800Hz, this
is not typical and indicates IMO sort sort of cone / surround resonance.
I would not be happy if my bass / mids measures like that in free air.

rgds, sreten.

crazyhub 31st August 2010 08:23 PM

Hi Timo,

Some SEAS drivers of this Sd show this little bump on their impedance plot around 800hz, usually those which are relatively flat above this fr, like i.e. my U18RNX/P pair; I didn't yet measure their fr response because no box built at this time but here are two free air impedance plots:
http://a.imageshack.us/img693/9868/z...brenonrods.png

http://a.imageshack.us/img411/3967/zu18magnifie.png

This type of anomaly doesn't obligatory show a problem not manageable in the fr response (filtering)...but what is problematic to me is your 3dbs difference! I would return one or both of these drivers because if we do pay for European drivers we do pay for their supposed consistency...at least it's my opinion.

Inductor 1st September 2010 06:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tipo1000 (Post 2289417)
Hi,

There's up to 3dB difference in FR between two SEAS P18RNX/P drivers at about 800Hz region when measured in same cabinet.

I measured impedance for both drivers in free air. See the attachment. Is this kind of difference in impedance normal between drivers?

Thanks,
Timo

You say is not the xover?
The difference of 3dB (fr. curve) you mention is not shown. You show a curve for impedance of both drivers that is typical from the manufacturer of a not matched pair. More details are needed to understand. Probably I would buy a third driver to match with one of the existents, if problematic (3dB difference).:xfingers:

speakerdoctor 1st September 2010 11:48 AM

2 Attachment(s)
I recently refoamed two vintage Thiel 5 inch midranges and they had an impedance 'kink' in the 800-900 hz range. These mids were originally heavily coated - both cones and foam; perhaps to address resonance issues. I coated the foam with 3 coats of a PVA solution, but it didn't alter the impedance test.

The mid was hooked up to my function generator and I listened for any anoying resonance based sounds but couldn't detect any. So, I then did a quick respose test using HolmImpulse simply holding the driver in air. It looked fine.

Sometimes when I see a kink in the impedance test I look for a loose spider which can cause them also.

tipo1000 3rd September 2010 06:31 AM

Back to original question about impedance difference between these two drivers: Based on batch numbers there´s almost three years between their production and according to distributor there is differencies from batch to batch. So maybe that explains it....

But where this impedance bump comes from in first place? SEAS data sheet shows small bump in FR in same region.

Cheers,
Timo

tipo1000 3rd September 2010 06:34 AM

1 Attachment(s)
And Seas data...


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:33 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2