|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Orygun
|
Looking for a small driver similar to the SB12NRX but with an efficiency of 90dB SPL 1W/m or better versus the SB12's ~84dB. And pulling a total blank, though I've found a couple nice five inchers and several sixes. Any suggestions? Application is the mid in a four way nude dipole, target frequency range is 500Hz to 2kHz---I've been planning to use the BG Neo8 but the fairly good front/back wave symmetry John K is getting out of the 10F in the Nao Note has prompted me to check for other options.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ontario
|
I'm not sure if this meets your criteria but Zaph just tested the Scan Speak Discovery 10F/4424G00 and it looks quite nice.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Agree with GOWA, Try use the HR program when comparing the drivers:
b |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Orygun
|
Since John K was using it the 10F was one of the first drivers I checked. However the sensitivity of both variants is a bit under 86.5dB 1W/m. Agree the 8424G00's a stronger candidate than the SB12 based on sensitivity and Rms, but the 10F's unusually low Sd is a bit of a problem---this is visible in bjorno's HR comparison above 150Hz. I agree with Zaph the 10F's more of a three inch driver.
Looking over ScanSpeak's lineup again I suppose I should add the 15M/4624G00 to the list of fivers. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: US
|
Fostex has a few, 126E and 127E,
ALTEC CF208-8A, 3" driver: Faital Pro 3FE20. I'm betting all have some problems with their surrounds, at least when compared to the Scan 10F. I can vouch for the *sound* of the Altec driver (..but I haven't had access to measurement equipment for some time now). The build quality *looks* fairly decent as well. Again though, I can almost guarantee that it has some issues with the surround. I'd bet that the Faital Pro's sound is the *least* likely to have problems with it's surround of the grouping, AND I'd bet the subjective impression is *very* detailed - more so that even the Scan 10F.
__________________
perspective is everything |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Orygun
|
The FE126E and FE127E are discontinued, replaced by the FE126En which has 0.35mm xmax. The FF125K is probably a stronger option, particularly as it lacks the FE whizzer but, like 0.35mm, its 0.15mm xmax is certainly painful for dipole use. Not having any luck digging up the Altec, but the Faital Pro 5FE120 is probably the best set of tradeoffs so far. Thanks. (If I can figure out how to get my hands on one, anyway.
Quote:
I'll cross to the woofer in the four way before the mid ends up needing too much excursion, but it does need enough xmax to hit 0.5mm or so with good THD/IMD.
Last edited by twest820; 8th August 2010 at 11:00 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
FF125 is also discontinued. Rumour (from a different distrib) is that we could see a variation on the FF line but with specs closer to the FExx7 series than the FExx6 series. That doesn't help your project thou. dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
|
This driver does look promising, a very compact dedicated midrange with nice sensitivity and a nice price. I found a vendor with a quick search asking US$25 for these. Kind of a goofy mounting flange though, it suggests reverse-mounting for sure.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: US
|
I got the part number wrong on the Altec..
ALTEC CF404-8A Speakers http://www.altecpro.com/pdfs/CF404_SS.PDF Again, sounds pretty good - but probably measures pretty poor. (..I'd purchased it for a radial mid use, and it's pretty good for that.)
__________________
perspective is everything |
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Orygun
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| High efficiency 12 inch midrange - recommendations? | hasselbaink | Multi-Way | 12 | 26th August 2009 09:00 AM |
| Low wattage, high efficiency, high quality? | Nordic | Multi-Way | 5 | 4th September 2005 11:12 PM |
| High Qms bass driver | Ap | Multi-Way | 3 | 3rd June 2004 08:07 PM |
| 12" driver with big Xmax,low Fs, & high efficiency? | WolfmanX | Multi-Way | 18 | 26th November 2002 11:10 PM |
| efficiency of high power toroids at low load? | capslock | Parts | 8 | 24th April 2002 10:26 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12136 seconds (76.93% PHP - 23.07% MySQL) with 11 queries |