Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

between 2X audax and 1X peerless
between 2X audax and 1X peerless
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 29th June 2003, 01:54 AM   #1
tech.knockout is offline tech.knockout  Australia
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Parra, Sydney
Default between 2X audax and 1X peerless

I just found out about a Australian supplier of sensibily priced Audax drivers. Made me think twice.

I can choose between 2(yes 2) Audax Paper cone HP170G0 and use them in a low power MTM config or TM Peerless HDS two way.

The disadvantages of Audax: The audax drivers have a puny magnet for a 6.5" driver, the Fs is much higher (51Hz), low Xmax (3.5mm each -- but theres two of them anyway) and very low power handling (45W). I would really want the audax HDA, but they are out of my price range.
And they aren't as well known as the Peerless or their HDA brothers.

The disadvantages of Peerless HDS: Less Xmax(5.5mm) than the 2 audax drivers combined(7mm). I can only use one of them.

note: For those who ask why dont I just buy one high end Audax driver--- the AUdax drivers generally have really crap X-max each, thus have really crap bass extension compared to other offerings, hence I need two of them.

what do you think...which choice should I go for?
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2003, 08:48 AM   #2
pinkmouse is offline pinkmouse  Europe
diyAudio Moderator
pinkmouse's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rotherham, England
between 2X audax and 1X peerless
A lot of speaker manufacturers quote Xmax as the maximum between both front and back displacement, wheras Audax do it just one way, from the rest position. I don't know how Peerless measure Xmax, but be aware that it might only be half of what you think it is

The Audax paper cones are generally nice drivers, so don't worry about their apparent cheapness. However if you can get the budget HDA drivers, the ones with the plastic baskets like the AP170Z0, I would recommend them highly.
Rick: Oh Cliff / Sometimes it must be difficult not to feel as if / You really are a cliff / when fascists keep trying to push you over it! / Are they the lemmings / Or are you, Cliff? / Or are you Cliff?
  Reply With Quote


between 2X audax and 1X peerlessHide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Audax ?? cypher Full Range 5 23rd March 2008 10:58 PM
peerless xxls sealed -vs- peerless xls with passive radiator Naudio Subwoofers 8 23rd March 2008 09:00 PM
Audax AM100G2 Vs. Peerless 831990 For an array? tolits Multi-Way 1 15th May 2006 08:59 AM
2-way audax bhg41088 Multi-Way 1 23rd July 2004 04:38 AM
Whats the difference between the Peerless 831916 and Peerless 850122 SkinnyBoy Multi-Way 9 12th June 2003 03:11 PM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:29 PM.

Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 16.67%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2017 diyAudio