|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mountain View, CA
|
The Behringer B2031P, as I've measured it, looks great on paper. A friend from work kept telling me this speaker really sounded accurate. I honestly thought that by accurate he was talking about a typical monitor speaker. He's mentioned this about 5 times or so at work so I finally went to his house for a listen after seeing Dr. Geddes measurements of a Behringer monitor on his Preview Data Program. After listening I brought the speaker home for some measurements. Set the mic for midway between the MW and tweeter and got this:
![]() ![]() and the average of the polar: ![]() Vertical polar toward the woofer in 11.25 degree steps: ![]() 11.25 degree steps toward the tweeter: ![]() Looked good so far. I returned the speaker satisfied by the results. Dan |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mountain View, CA
|
Impressed I returned to work confirming his ear. Another friend wanted some small HT speakers and I wanted a pair as well, se we ordered 4 for $304 shipped!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() The top 2 were 1 pair and the bottom 2 another. This time I had the mic height in the center of the tweeter. The typical impulse looked like this: ![]() The pairs matched each other well, but both the impulse and polar graph looked worse than what I measured from my buddy's even though the speaker sounded the same to my ear. I returned to the Preview Data Program...... Dan |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mountain View, CA
|
Yea, Dr. Geddes measurements look more like my first. Could those ports be causing a diffraction problem?
![]() Well. I went to the wife's make up drawer and nabbed some cotton balls and stuffed those ports closed. Here's what happened: ![]() ![]() Spectrogram comparisons from REW Beta5: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Sorry about the extra noise in the spectrogram with the cotton balls stuffed in the ports. You can see in the impulse that the first reflection is a touch earlier and thus the contamination of the graph--well technically all graphs. Well I'm starting my own cotton ball product called "Diffraction B Gone"(that's a joke). Well, what happened to the bass after that? I took this 2 ft from the speaker both ways. The one with the slightly less bass has the cotton balls in it. Buy subs people. ![]() Dan |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
|
Where did you get 4 for $304 shipped?
__________________
Building a 2.1 system out of a 3/4"x4'x8' sheet |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mountain View, CA
|
Zzounds. Sorry, never saw the reply. Low price guarantee and B&HPhoto had them cheap.
Dan |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| new to modifying | qclabrat | Solid State | 2 | 24th July 2010 10:13 AM |
| Help modifying circuit | Rob11966 | Tubes / Valves | 14 | 3rd November 2008 05:14 AM |
| Modifying a Garrard | Arne | Analogue Source | 3 | 9th May 2005 02:28 PM |
| Modifying drivers. | Ap | Multi-Way | 2 | 1st March 2004 11:39 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08836 seconds (77.52% PHP - 22.48% MySQL) with 10 queries |