|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
|
I'm looking at 4 Acoustic elegance dipole woofers, 2 td 15m's and a variety of compression drivers and horns scattered around my living room.
Idea is to put these in an active system (DEQ+DCX) to be completed by end of summer. I want to try a completely dipole setup. So, if you could design the "ultimate" open baffle... baffle for the 15m+waveguide, what would a good width be for proper off-axis response? I've tried various setups in Edge and read through some of JohnK's dipole text. Since I can hammer the response into line with the DEQ and the mid is 15" is there anything to worry about? Again, will experiment once I've built it, but would rather not commit to some incurable baffle dimension. Thinking about mounting the baffle on a frame of 80/20 modular aluminum so it can slide up and down as dictated by seating position. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Moscow, ID
|
Hi Ang,
I see that you are a fellow computational neuroscientist. It sounds like you are building more of a beyond the ariel-esque ob. It also sounds like you know the theory. I would advise not letting the theory get you stuck in indecision. OB baffles are super easy to prototype. I would just start cutting. You can iteratively work to what you find optimum. The trend seems to suggest that smaller OBs image better, but they also require more EQ. Stig's baffleless approach exemplifies this extreme. Lynn's approach, as I understand it, is to go passive and to try and minimize the amount of EQ needed so that low power SE triode amps can be used. My OB falls closer to Lynn's approach. It is a 3 way passive with active shelving. I power it with a SE mosfet amp. I have a 24" Hartley in infinite baffle so the OB only needs to make it to 70Hz. As Pirsig's narrator in Zen and the Art of Motorcyle Maintenance so eloquently put it we aren't working with parts we are working with concepts. Roger Last edited by roger_lew; 16th July 2010 at 05:28 PM. Reason: grammar, typed on phone |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
|
Thank Roger. I may just go for narrow baffle relative to 15" and a wide roundover, then see how much it can be tweaked with XO adjustments.
and yes - compneuro leaves precious little time for speaker, but if you're ever giving a talk at Pitt or CMU let me know and you can have a listen to whatever I come up with. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Collated Design Criteria/dimensions for Ariel ML-TL Design | talsius | Full Range | 1 | 13th October 2011 05:28 AM |
| Should I use baffle step compensation for a DIY surround speaker x-over design? | marchel | Multi-Way | 10 | 21st November 2007 07:49 PM |
| Any spice models around for AA5-esque battery tubes? | aletheian | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 30th March 2007 12:35 AM |
| new speaker baffle design concept...good or not? | thadman | Multi-Way | 4 | 20th November 2006 01:15 AM |
| Open Baffle Speaker Design using BG Neo-8? | Matt MacBeth | Multi-Way | 2 | 24th December 2002 03:44 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08870 seconds (73.88% PHP - 26.12% MySQL) with 10 queries |