
Home  Forums  Rules  Articles  The diyAudio Store  Gallery  Blogs  Register  Donations  FAQ  Calendar  Search  Today's Posts  Mark Forums Read  Search 
MultiWay Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers 

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
1st July 2010, 03:32 PM  #1 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: SofiaBulgaria

4 Way Series Crossover?
Hi guys,
I'm thinking of an easy way to construct 4 way crossover. 1. My question is whether the crossover from the drawing will work normally? 2. Will it behave as a second row crossover for the tweeter? 3. If the answer to QNo:2 is "NO", Will adding additional capacitor for the tweeter work normally/can it be added without ending in problems with the response? 4. Do you like it? 5. Any other opinion and recommendations are welcome and needed! Best Regards! 
1st July 2010, 06:11 PM  #2 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lyon

Hi,
1. I don't know, more work should be done. 2. I don't know 3. ? 4. Interesting because I like passive crossover techniques, there are a lot work to do in this area. Each day I learn things. 5. Easy doesn't mean correct. A four way is a complex loudspeaker for experiment designers. The crossover could be more complex. This topology seems complex and needs a lot work to make it work : You should by hand calculate the formula to estimate the components value. The polarity of the driver must be correctly estimate too, not always the case. Take a look here : ARGOS loudspeakers ARGOS loudspeakers Regards. 
1st July 2010, 07:37 PM  #3 
frugalphile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator

It will "work", but a bit of a nightmare to get to work well as changing one component will affect all the rest. You also have a mix of 1st and 2nd order i believe.
dave
__________________
community sites tlinespeakers.org, frugalhorn.com, frugalphile.com ........ commercial site planet10HiFi p10hifi forum here at diyA 
2nd July 2010, 12:11 AM  #4 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009

Yes, it will work but as Planet 10 said, it won't be easy. I did exactly the same thing in 2002 for a 4way I still use today in my 2channel HT setup, but I eventually broke it into two series crossovers, one for the tweeter and upper midrange (upper half) and the other for the lower midrange and woofer (lower half). Then I treated those as two parts of a combined parallel network with a capacitor feeding the upper half and an inductor feeding the lower half.
Paul 
2nd July 2010, 02:14 AM  #5 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Western Sydney

this article may be of interest: Series vs. Parallel Crossover Networks
I think series xovers are good for simple 1st order 2ways, but beyond that they aren't worth the hassle (although it's an appealing idea)  it's much easier to predict the outcome of changes in parallel xovers. I think Tony Gee uses mostly series xovers: Humble Homemade Hifi
__________________
Impedance varies with frequency, use impedance plots of your drivers and make crossover calculations using the actual impedance of the driver at the crossover frequency 
2nd July 2010, 01:34 PM  #7 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2008

The problem with using a series crossover (unless it is designed by someone with experience), is that one driver affects the other. They do this via their impedances, which are complex and varied with frequency, in a way which doesn't benefit crossover design but simply "is what it is".
Only two ways to get this to work predictably, IMO. One is to model the drivers and compute the responses, the other is to equalise the impedances and then begin with the textbook crossovers and tweak them until the response is satisfactory. 
2nd July 2010, 05:29 PM  #8 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: SofiaBulgaria

Thank you guys!!! You really opened my eyes!
I think that with a certain approach and careful driver choosing this type of crossover is easier opposed to parallel crossovers which don't care that you choose and how you choose it In my opinion the main risk with series crossover are the impedance versus frequency curves of both the inductor and the capacitor. At the crossing frequency they both should be at least: >or=driver impX2 or >or= imp of driver1+ imp of driver2 For example: both drivers are 8 ohm  8+8=16, if the capacitor and the inductance are both 8 ohm at that frequency, then the LC formed by them will be 16 ohm as well and two 16 ohm resistances in parallel equal 8 ohm total resistance... ...but signal path through one of the elements and one of the speakers will be with resistance of 16 ohms as well and 16+16 is 8 when talking about crossovers... then 8+16 is 5.33 ohms which is within tolerable for all amplifiers (PARALLEL RESISTOR CALCULATOR) But if we are dealing with 4 ohm drivers? Then we will end with 2.66 ohm impedance at the crossover point... which is uncool... So smaller capacitors ans bigger inductances can be considered as a safety rule of thumb... Question: at what point below the mean level should be the crossover point for first order crossovers?  3, 6, 9 or 12  I'm in a doubt between 3 and 6... But resistance equal to the driver impedance attenuates it with 6 decibels... but with 6 db for both decibels at the crossover point I end up with the 2.33 ohm imp for 4 ohm drivers...  is that normal or is due to untrue suggestions? Thank you for the answers in advance! 
3rd July 2010, 01:08 AM  #9 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2008

It might be useful to know what sort of test gear you have, measurement gear, software?

3rd July 2010, 09:04 AM  #10 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Newcastle, Australia

T101
I'm not sure what you are getting at with your impedance references and I don't think it works like that. There is a thread around here somewhere that mentions 1st order series and parallel crossovers using the same values have the same impedance plot. I've attached a impedance plot for series (bottom graph) and parallel (top graph) crossovers using a 6R nom tweeter and a 8R nom woofer using the same inductor and cap values. The plots are identical and the impedance used to create these are the actual (imp/freq plot) and not nominal. When you introduce correction circuits into the filter then the impedance plots do vary but are generally quite close at the crossover point. First order crossovers are 3dB down at the crossover point. You really need to model in some software using frd and zma files and you get to see what's really happening with the FR and impedance etc if you are interested in how it all looks. Using textbook formulae gives little or no indication on what's really happening. That said, all Andy G's are done without measuring etc but he's very experienced and gets great results. Have a look around Andy G's site and you will get a better idea of what's possible with 1st order series. I've heard his speakers and they get a big thumbs up and it's through his influence many years ago that made me head over to series crossovers in the first place.
__________________
No longer DIY active 
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Series Crossover  george a  MultiWay  158  2nd April 2013 06:56 AM 
Series crossover problem  F1 FAN  MultiWay  22  27th June 2006 11:09 PM 
Series crossover conspiracy.......  rabbitz  MultiWay  12  15th July 2004 10:37 AM 
series crossover with 2.5 way bass  madinoz  MultiWay  18  8th June 2004 01:55 AM 
Series Crossover!!!!!! and some other stuff  bostarob  MultiWay  7  13th July 2002 03:37 PM 
New To Site?  Need Help? 