|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi all
![]() I'm a beginner in loudspeaker design, and have in mind a 2-way closed-box with one SEAS CA22NRX woofer. The woofer manufacturer published the following TS parameters: - fs = 29 Hz - Vas = 97 l - Qms = 2.04 - Qes = 0.52 I cannot measure these parameters myself, but found here Poor Man' these numbers: - fs = 38.5 Hz - Vas = 51.84 l - Qms = 2.27 - Qes = 0.51 If i take the manufacturer parameters, i could end with a 25l enclosure targeting F3 at about 60 Hz. If i take the second set of parameters, the same procedure will lead to a 13l enclosure with F3 at about 80 Hz... I can live with the imprecision on fs, but i'm more concerned about the value of Vas. If i make a small enclosure i might get a boomy sound, which i don't want. If i make a larger enclosure i might get really little bass... Any advice on what i should do: trust the manufacturer, trust the independent measurements or look for some compromise? ![]() Regards, chaparK |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lyon
|
Hi
A second set of measurements. Thiel & small CA22RNX Fs = 38.55 Hz Re = 5.80 ohms[dc] Le = 1531.29 uH L2 = 610.14 uH R2 = 14.78 ohms Qt = 0.42 Qes = 0.51 Qms = 2.34 Mms = 22.33 grams Rms = 2.309682 kg/s Cms = 0.000763 m/N Vas = 55.23 liters Sd= 226.98 cm^2 Bl = 7.820266 Tm ETA = 0.59 % Lp(2.83V/1m) = 91.23 dB Closed Box Method: Box volume = 65.00 liters Diameter= 17.00 cm Do not trust the manufacturer. I think 30L for a closed box ? F3=64Hz. 25L also works . Regards. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Novi, Michigan
|
My advice is this. The two sets of measurements should have a decent cone mass calculation - average them. Then ignore the VAS and just use the box compliance. Set the F3 that you want from these numbers and you won't be far off.
"Boomy" is mostly the room and placement and has very liuttle to do with the enclosure design. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi Jerome, gedlee,
Thanks for your posts and sorry for answering late. Given that there are two independent sets of measurements that are mostly identical, i'll go for these and discard the manufacturer data. Hope to post here soon more details as i'm going to need more advices ![]() Regards, chaparK |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi all!
I haven't been onto this post for some time. I was busy with the amplifier for my project. It's a 4-channel with Tripath TA2022, one channel per driver. I know it's not the right place for talking about amplifiers, but well i'm building my whole sound system consisting of DSP + Amp + Speakers, so it's a bit hard to split the project into separate topics. Here are some pics of the amp (awful picture quality, gee )I'll be back in a short while with a couple of questions regarding the speaker enclosures! Best! chapark |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
As i wrote in my first post, that's my first loudspeaker project so i'd like to keep it easy and concentrate on sound only.
That's the reason why i've selected a 2-way only design (rather than a 3-way) and that's also why i'm choosing a closed-box enclosure. Maybe that in the future the project will end into a 3-way vented - in the meantime the idea is more about learning some cool stuff about loudspeaker design rather than achieving from scratch the ultimate sound system (oh god where did i learn to flatter old experts like that? Here's a draft of what i have in mind. It's a basic symmetric bookshelf. The drivers are: - SEAS CA22NRX - Eton 25SD1 - Is there something fundamentally wrong with my design? - I'm probably going to mount/unmount the drivers a few times, so i'm not too crazy about self-threading screws (parker style). What's an other good alternative? - Finally, i heard that it's better for a closed-box not to be too air-tight, so that the atmospheric pressure can easily balance inside and outside. That makes sense to me. What does it mean practically? Where should the air leakage take place? Thanks all for reading this post! chaparK EDIT: forgot to mention that the box will be built with MDF 18mm Last edited by chaparK; 7th August 2010 at 10:10 AM. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi all,
Here's an update of my little project with a few pictures. Still need to cut the braces, then it will be time to glue it all. Cheers, chaparK 04122010_005.jpg 04122010_008.jpg 04122010_012.jpg |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
More work done this weekend, still need to cut the braces.
11122010_001.jpg 11122010_002.jpg Anyone knows where i can find 5/32" screws like the one pictured below around Sydney? screw.jpg |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Dilletante, tinkerer and beggathoner supreme
diyAudio Member
|
Why not use Metric? Are these for T-nuts? Anyway most bolt and nut places should be able to supply. Try Coventry fasteners
Coventry Group
__________________
QUOTE" The more I know, the more I know, I know (insert maniacal laugh >here<) NOTHING" |
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Yes the screws are for the nuts and their bloody imperial thread (Hurricane nuts ordered from parts-express). |
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Q in closed box design | Hyldal | Multi-Way | 23 | 18th July 2007 11:05 AM |
| Closed box design:Scan Speak monitor | Jonasa | Multi-Way | 74 | 13th May 2007 08:17 PM |
| Lambda TD12s Closed Box / Bass Reflex Design | akunec | Multi-Way | 7 | 13th September 2005 02:44 AM |
| Closed/sealed box design strategy | Tyimo | Multi-Way | 6 | 3rd March 2005 04:57 PM |
| Closed box design using W.M. Leach | ppfred | Multi-Way | 5 | 23rd December 2004 09:37 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |