Bl important? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 1st January 2002, 08:30 AM   #1
pkgum is offline pkgum  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: sydney
Default Bl important?

I found the Bl rating of the Blueprint 1503 to be relatively low at 20 compared to other similar drivers. Does this matter in a high excursion driver like a Blueprint?
Why is the Bl of the Blueprint 1503 so low anyway?

For those who say that a BP can shake the whole house up, I'm not disagreeing with u, it's just the question of whether it can do that with smooth power and finesse.

In emailing Pat of Blueprintdrivers he replied :

" Okay. So I will concede that Bl is important. But Bl is a product of "B" (the motors strength) and "l" (the length of the wire in the gap). But If I measure a dual 8 ohm coil in series (16 ohms) then the Bl will be double of what the 4 ohm (both coils in parallel, which is internally what the 03 coil is). So should I measure it this way to have a significantly higher Bl to make the numbers look "better". This will not change the actual drivers specs or how it works at all, just the Bl product (due to the change in length of wire not the actual motors strength). The motor has plenty of strength, even with the large gaps that we run. It would be possible to tighten up the tolerences some, but we like the specs where they are and do not want them to change (which would happen with a tighter gap). "


What if the other companies of the similar drivers I've compared with the Blueprint, didn't measure a dual 8ohm coil in series, but still got a much higher Bl than the Blueprint...



Note: Still...I think the Blueprint is a fantastic driver
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st January 2002, 10:43 AM   #2
Warp Engineer
On Holiday
 
AudioFreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Queensland, Australia
Default Re: Bl important?

Quote:
Originally posted by pkgum
What if the other companies of the similar drivers I've compared with the Blueprint, didn't measure a dual 8ohm coil in series, but still got a much higher Bl than the Blueprint...
You've certainly got a point there ... most the big excursion drivers with DVC's that i've seen have their specs measured with the coils in parallel.

Try comparing B for various drivers.
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st January 2002, 05:07 PM   #3
Wizard of Kelts
diyAudio Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Connecticut, The Nutmeg State
Gum:

To be honest, I don't really bother with that stuff. If you can get independent verification from users that the driver lives up to it's publiched specs when put into an enclosure, that's fine with me.

I assume a competent designer can take a large magnet and not waste it by bad design. So I don't sweat that stuff. Some manufacturers seem to get more out of smaller magnets than other manufacturers as well. Why? I don't know.

If the unit puts out what the Thiele-Small parameters indicate it will, I am happy.

Here is a web page by the well regarded Lambda Acoustics-makers of Stryke speakers-to the effect that small differences in Bl product is of less than critical importance:
http://www.lambdacoustics.com/librar...ers/bl_mms.htm

There is some question I have about Blueprints, having never used one. That is the matter of a shorting ring, or Faraday ring, in the magnet system. This prevents the voice coil, as it approaches Fb in a ported box, to actually travel all the way back to the end of it's excursion, so that it can move forward only. This actually clips off half the wave form.

You would think that the condition would sound terrible, but in fact it takes the form of "second harmonic distortion", which musically is called the "first overtone", and actually sounds very musical. The only trouble is, the phenomenon takes away your lowest fundamental and replaces it with the first overtone. It could sound worse, true, but you are missing your lowest fundamentals!

I do not know if the phenomenon occurs in the sealed box.

There are other ways of preventing this "suck-in" phenomenon besides. I would be interested if Blueprint uses those, instead of a shorting ring.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
important question please help me odysseybmx414 Chip Amps 3 8th May 2005 11:24 PM
An Important Read valveitude Tubes / Valves 5 29th April 2005 02:11 PM
Important!!! Clarkcr The Lounge 4 15th September 2004 04:34 AM
where is short wiring in an amp important/ not important ? sandro600 Solid State 5 4th April 2004 04:10 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:50 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2