|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Aarhus, Denmark
|
Hi,
I would really appreciate your help configuring my digital (active) filters for my 3-way horn rig in order to achieve phase correct filters. I am aware that in order to get the best results I would need proper measurements of the system. Unfortunately, I do not have that. What I do have is: • Simulation (from Horn Resp) of the phase response from the bass horn (see pic) • Simulation (from Horn Resp) of the phase response for the midrange horn (see pic) • Measurement (from StigErik – thanks!) of the phase response for the tweeter (see pic) I know the drivers “reach” each other. The crossover points shall be: • 290 Hz (between the bass horns and mid horns) • 1,500 Hz (between the mid horns and the tweeter) Please note: I would prefer to use fairly steep filters if possible (4th order of 8th order LR, wherever possible). Note further, that the software allows for 2nd, 4th or 8th order LR filters as well as 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, or 8th order Butterworth filters. Finally, each section can be attenuated to match the other sections, and the software allows for using delays of each section if needed. Thanks a lot for you input! Best regards Peter |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Trondheim
|
Quote:
I really think you should reconsider this position. I believe that you will get a better result if you do some simple measurements with: super-cheapo mic: Clas Ohlson Internettbutikk Free software: HOLM Acoustics You should be able to get the phase-tracking right around you XO points even if you use the internal mic-input of a lap-top. Doing this blindfolded based on simulated response and some guys guesstimate on diyaudio is not likely to work out (IMHO). good luck! Øyvin Eikeland |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Aarhus, Denmark
|
Quote:
Thanks a lot for responding! Yes, I know that real measurements would be better for sure! And ultimately there may be no other way. However, I just thought that I would give it a go, if someone - based on the simulations - would come up with a filter configuration that would be phase correct. Once again thanks for responding! Best regards Peter |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Cant get my setup to sound correct | nick[x1] | Car Audio | 6 | 15th December 2006 04:49 PM |
| Active crossover with linear phase response | ackcheng | Solid State | 1 | 20th July 2004 05:54 AM |
| Doubts on Phase Response and Frequency Response | dumrum | Multi-Way | 11 | 5th April 2004 10:39 AM |
| Phase correct drivers | EternaLightWith | Multi-Way | 16 | 5th May 2003 01:20 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09467 seconds (66.99% PHP - 33.01% MySQL) with 11 queries |