Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12th June 2010, 12:56 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
gainphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Melbourne the sunny city!
Question LR reverse null axis

For the purpose of developing time-aligned LR xo, where is the best place to measure and check the reverse null?

- At tweeter axis, 1m
- At midrange axis, 1m
- At ear/listening height, 1m
- or at listening position?
__________________
http://gainphile.blogspot.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2010, 02:35 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by gainphile View Post
For the purpose of developing time-aligned LR xo, where is the best place to measure and check the reverse null?

- At tweeter axis, 1m
- At midrange axis, 1m
- At ear/listening height, 1m
- or at listening position?
Is this a 2 driver two way? If so, set the mic 1m from the baffle directly between the center of the two drivers. MTM is a little harder because you have to put the mic at the tweeter axis, then account for the distance between tweeter and mid woofers.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2010, 04:56 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
jerome69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lyon
- At tweeter axis, 1m
I have used to measuring like this and I'm happy with the result.
I consider the tweeter very directive and I measure at the tweeter height.
The reverse of the midrange of my big OB and the result is convincing
Click the image to open in full size.

- At midrange axis, 1m
I never use this.

- At ear/listening height, 1m
Not easy to do. The height of the sit is very variable. And people don't have the same height.

- or at listening position?
Could be done only to measure the response but I think too much reflection to see a deep suck.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th June 2010, 12:10 AM   #4
ttan98 is offline ttan98  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Melb
Hi,

Do you necessary trying to to achieve/get a deep null in FR curve when the driver is connected in reverse? In some cases when you connect the drivers in correct order there a dip at the X-over frequency. I think some people will get, is this a more suitable response? or one should try to get a flatter response(not a bigger dip at x-over frequencies) when the measuring OFF-axis FR curves measurements ie horizontal and vertical dispersion measurements should do not deviate too much from on-axis measurements. I use this approach I am happy with the sound. I think this area should be discussed further.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Null Test tbrooke Pass Labs 6 12th May 2009 03:51 PM
LR 4th order vs LR 8th order crossover redliner Subwoofers 1 7th January 2009 11:32 PM
How to interpret reverse null? Jay_WJ Multi-Way 7 11th April 2007 12:36 AM
LR xover question steverb Multi-Way 12 20th April 2004 09:12 PM
output LR filter Helix Solid State 7 8th February 2002 12:08 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:47 AM.

Page generated in 0.09273 seconds (72.42% PHP - 27.58% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio