Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28th May 2010, 11:25 PM   #1
Forsman is offline Forsman  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
Forsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Default What about Open baffles and line arrays.

I’ve read pretty contradictious statements about OB line array. Many on this forum are praising the sound quality of OB Line Arrays. In different threads I can read that other people with well documented experiences are stating that OB line arrays is just a to complicated construction why better left alone.

Why I’m curious in this matter is because I’ve got 24 3½ in drivers and 50 small 1 in tweeters (Veco 32KC08-1). I’m going to build some sort of line array but I’m far from sure that I dare to go OB.

Is OB line array a safe way to go or is it a tricky and complicated path?

Kind regards
/Forsman
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th May 2010, 12:17 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
trusound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Missouri
Send a message via AIM to trusound
I am a huge proponent of OB... but only if you have the room.. IMO the room needed to pull off OB let alone a line array OB it paramount...

I always think to myself after seeing pictures of OB apllications were the speakers are close to both the back and side walls that there isn't any way that it could sound right..

You need the space to pull off OB
__________________
Randy Kunin
www.soundsbydesign.net
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th May 2010, 12:26 AM   #3
juliopr is offline juliopr  Puerto Rico
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Hello. Maybe I am not the best or the most expert, but, in my limited experience I believe that the use of so much drivers will require appropiate amplification and filtration(IMO active XO),which will provide the best control of those drivers. Also, the small radiating area will deliver limited bass response and the baffle area will affect the sound quality. I recently built an OB and used fewer drivers but bigger ones( 2x15", 1x6.5", 1x B&G NEO8) with active XO and Tri-amp. At this moment It is the best speaker I ever had and satisfies both quality and levels of listening. I wanted to have the soundstage and spaciousness of a planar magnetic or electrostatic, but with higher volume level and dynamism. The only worry I had was lack of bass due to the natural roll off but with the Eminence alpha 15 driver, I got plenty of bass. Maybe those 3.5" will be better on a boxed line array design. But that is only my humble opinion.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th May 2010, 09:32 AM   #4
Rudolf is offline Rudolf  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
Rudolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
I don`t see any contradicting requirements between OB and line array. But of course the combined requirements will need more attention than OB or line array only.
In your possible application I see just one issue to take care of: If your crossover to the bass section is well above the Schroeder frequency of your room, your bass section should be a line array too. Below the Schroeder frequency you are free to apply any principle you want.

Rudolf
__________________
www.dipolplus.de
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th May 2010, 12:13 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Mostly agreeing to what Rudolf says,

i recommend this paper, unless you already know it.

http://www.systemsolutions.co.za/Tec...te%20Paper.pdf

For dipole operation you will need 1-1.5m of free space behind the speaker.

If you are willing to invest that space, you can go OB.

In my opinion the line array part itself is the more diffcult one,
since there are more concepts to line arrays than just simulating
a "true line source".

There are "constant beamwidth" concepts, bessel arrays, arrays
shaded with frequency and so on.

You also have to decide, if you want fullrange dipole operation,
which is what i prefer when going OB, or if you want your tweeters
to operate as monopole line source only.

Using a baffle, whch is taller that 2.2 x diameter of the drivers,
is a good thing to avoid lobing in the horizontal plane.

Linkwitz Lab - Loudspeaker Design


But with such a tall baffle, you will either need lots of EQ in the
deep bass or you will need a dedicated subwoofer - which is what
i recomend.

Linkwitzlab and Rudolfs page

Dipolplus

are good sites to have a start on the OB matter.

Kind regards
__________________
Oliver, RFZ believer (?)
www.dipol-audio.de
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th May 2010, 01:32 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
StigErik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
I'm in the process of testing an OB line-array. Thread here:
Dipole line-array idea
__________________
dipoles dipoles dipoles dipoles dipoles dipoles dipoles dipoles and dipoles
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th May 2010, 01:33 PM   #7
6.283 is offline 6.283  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Black Forest
Hi Oliver,

Quote:
Originally Posted by LineArray View Post

Using a baffle, whch is taller that 2.2 x diameter of the drivers,
is a good thing to avoid lobing in the horizontal plane.
taller => I guess you meant smaller (i.e. slimmer, narrower) ?

regards
Oliver
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th May 2010, 05:21 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Yes width <= 2.2 x diameter of driver.

English is not my mothertongue .

Linkwitz gives some hints on that.
__________________
Oliver, RFZ believer (?)
www.dipol-audio.de
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd June 2010, 10:08 PM   #9
Forsman is offline Forsman  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
Forsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by trusound View Post
I am a huge proponent of OB... but only if you have the room.. IMO the room needed to pull off OB let alone a line array OB it paramount...

You need the space to pull off OB
Unfortunately I have a rather small room.

Quote:
Originally Posted by juliopr View Post
Also, the small radiating area will deliver limited bass response and the baffle area will affect the sound quality.
Ok, I thought that a total sd of about 660 cm2 (almost the same area as a 12") was much but I understand that in an OB it isn’t.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LineArray View Post
Mostly agreeing to what Rudolf says,

i recommend this paper, unless you already know it.

http://www.systemsolutions.co.za/Tec...te%20Paper.pdf

For dipole operation you will need 1-1.5m of free space behind the speaker.

If you are willing to invest that space, you can go OB.
Thanks for the tips. Once again I see that you point out the importance of having the right room for the speaker.

Quote:
Originally Posted by StigErik View Post
I'm in the process of testing an OB line-array. Thread here:
Dipole line-array idea
I´m following your thread with great interest.

Thanks
/Forsman
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New open baffles hurdy_gurdyman Multi-Way 3 26th September 2007 02:22 PM
Time-Aligned Open Baffle Line Arrays.... chops Multi-Way 36 25th January 2006 12:15 PM
$7 open baffles... planet10 Full Range 31 8th May 2005 07:45 AM
Uber cheap open baffle line arrays -- almost done ryoshu Multi-Way 5 1st July 2003 11:31 PM
Open baffles? dc Multi-Way 5 28th December 2001 02:10 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:43 AM.

Page generated in 0.12446 seconds (77.69% PHP - 22.31% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio