|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
|
I’ve read pretty contradictious statements about OB line array. Many on this forum are praising the sound quality of OB Line Arrays. In different threads I can read that other people with well documented experiences are stating that OB line arrays is just a to complicated construction why better left alone.
Why I’m curious in this matter is because I’ve got 24 3½ in drivers and 50 small 1 in tweeters (Veco 32KC08-1). I’m going to build some sort of line array but I’m far from sure that I dare to go OB. Is OB line array a safe way to go or is it a tricky and complicated path? Kind regards /Forsman |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I am a huge proponent of OB... but only if you have the room.. IMO the room needed to pull off OB let alone a line array OB it paramount...
I always think to myself after seeing pictures of OB apllications were the speakers are close to both the back and side walls that there isn't any way that it could sound right.. You need the space to pull off OB |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
|
Hello. Maybe I am not the best or the most expert, but, in my limited experience I believe that the use of so much drivers will require appropiate amplification and filtration(IMO active XO),which will provide the best control of those drivers. Also, the small radiating area will deliver limited bass response and the baffle area will affect the sound quality. I recently built an OB and used fewer drivers but bigger ones( 2x15", 1x6.5", 1x B&G NEO8) with active XO and Tri-amp. At this moment It is the best speaker I ever had and satisfies both quality and levels of listening. I wanted to have the soundstage and spaciousness of a planar magnetic or electrostatic, but with higher volume level and dynamism. The only worry I had was lack of bass due to the natural roll off but with the Eminence alpha 15 driver, I got plenty of bass. Maybe those 3.5" will be better on a boxed line array design. But that is only my humble opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
|
I don`t see any contradicting requirements between OB and line array. But of course the combined requirements will need more attention than OB or line array only.
In your possible application I see just one issue to take care of: If your crossover to the bass section is well above the Schroeder frequency of your room, your bass section should be a line array too. Below the Schroeder frequency you are free to apply any principle you want. Rudolf
__________________
www.dipolplus.de |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
Mostly agreeing to what Rudolf says,
i recommend this paper, unless you already know it. http://www.systemsolutions.co.za/Tec...te%20Paper.pdf For dipole operation you will need 1-1.5m of free space behind the speaker. If you are willing to invest that space, you can go OB. In my opinion the line array part itself is the more diffcult one, since there are more concepts to line arrays than just simulating a "true line source". There are "constant beamwidth" concepts, bessel arrays, arrays shaded with frequency and so on. You also have to decide, if you want fullrange dipole operation, which is what i prefer when going OB, or if you want your tweeters to operate as monopole line source only. Using a baffle, whch is taller that 2.2 x diameter of the drivers, is a good thing to avoid lobing in the horizontal plane. Linkwitz Lab - Loudspeaker Design But with such a tall baffle, you will either need lots of EQ in the deep bass or you will need a dedicated subwoofer - which is what i recomend. Linkwitzlab and Rudolfs page Dipolplus are good sites to have a start on the OB matter. Kind regards |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
I'm in the process of testing an OB line-array. Thread here:
Dipole line-array idea
__________________
dipoles dipoles dipoles dipoles dipoles dipoles dipoles dipoles and dipoles |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Black Forest
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
Yes width <= 2.2 x diameter of driver.
English is not my mothertongue Linkwitz gives some hints on that. |
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Thanks /Forsman |
||||
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New open baffles | hurdy_gurdyman | Multi-Way | 3 | 26th September 2007 02:22 PM |
| Time-Aligned Open Baffle Line Arrays.... | chops | Multi-Way | 36 | 25th January 2006 12:15 PM |
| $7 open baffles... | planet10 | Full Range | 31 | 8th May 2005 07:45 AM |
| Uber cheap open baffle line arrays -- almost done | ryoshu | Multi-Way | 5 | 1st July 2003 11:31 PM |
| Open baffles? | dc | Multi-Way | 5 | 28th December 2001 02:10 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12446 seconds (77.69% PHP - 22.31% MySQL) with 10 queries |