|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
|
Hi to all, I have a question that someone maybe can answer. In a multiway system 2way or 3 way the goal is to make the driver to run in phase or not? I am asking because in a 2way speaker of mine I used a first a first order filter for LF and a first order for the tweeter, and after that a second order for both with the tweeter inverted. I ploted the phase diagrams and I found that in the second situation the drivers are exactly in phase, while in the first situation the tweeter is leading by 90 degrees. The starnge to me is that the first is more pleasant. Can someone comment anything on that? I also uploded the plots.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Here's an article that covers your questions...
Phase, Time and Distortion in Loudspeakers
__________________
"Throwing parts at a failure is like throwing sponges at a rainstorm." - Enzo My setup: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi...tang-band.html
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lyon
|
Hi,
Quote:
Drivers in phase mean at crossover frequency, the SPL of each drivers sum themselves perfectly . To verify the good phase you should invert one driver and measure the deep of the SPL. If the SPL curve has an enough deep hole >30dB, it is near perfect. Without actuals measurements you can't say anything. For example, here a 12" + 1" 1.1kHz ~LR4 ![]() For me the order of the electrical crossover don't have a lot of sense. You should use acoustic curves to do something. If you use a first electrical order crossover, you should have second order acoustic response. If you use a second order electrical, you should have fourth order acoustic etc. I can't say anything else because I don't know the drivers, the expected crossover frequency. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
|
Thanks for the respone to all of you. Jerome can you upload the img to diyaudio directly because somehow I can not see images from imageshack. Jerome you say that this is the goal to have drivers in phase, what I found out is that when drivers are in phase in my situation they sound everyehere and in any hight the same but not so alive as when is driven with 1st order. The drives are beyma tp21 tweeter and a celestion 15 inch woofer truvox 1525. Which one to prefer. Thnks
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lyon
|
This is the image :
![]() Have you the real proof your drivers are in phase ? (with an actual measurement) Trust your ears I think in you case first order is better. Note you cannot conclude and generalize first order crossovers are the best. |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
|
Quote:
When all of those elements are combined for the woofer and also for the tweeter, then the relative phase in the crossover region determines whether the units add well and with which phase polarity they best combine. Jerome's graph shows that very well. You don't see the phase curves but you can surmise that the polarities of the green curve are giving a very good sum (good relative phase in the crossover region) while the red curve shows heavy cancellation due to reversing one of the driver's connections. Note that that set of curves would be true for a position in space and when you move nearer one driver and away from the other, the story changes. This leads to nulls in the polar curve at the crossover frequency. David |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Are single drivers really phase coherent? | chuck55 | Full Range | 46 | 30th March 2010 06:03 AM |
| Measuring Phase Response of Drivers | Iain McNeill | Multi-Way | 35 | 15th October 2007 03:13 AM |
| phase issues with mounting 2 ribbon drivers next to each other? | thadman | Planars & Exotics | 9 | 31st July 2006 05:46 AM |
| Phase correct drivers | EternaLightWith | Multi-Way | 16 | 5th May 2003 01:20 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09995 seconds (70.58% PHP - 29.42% MySQL) with 11 queries |